Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39904786›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

An international survey of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging implementation in the head and neck.

Steve Connor, Alexander Christoforou, Philip Touska, Soraya Robinson, Nancy J Fischbein, Pim de Graaf, Anne R J Péporté, Jussi Hirvonen, Darka Hadnadjev Šimonji, Gloria J Guzmán Pérez-Carrillo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Steve ConnorSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. steve.connor@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-4972
Alexander ChristoforouKing's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
Philip TouskaDepartment of Radiology, Guy's Hospital and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Soraya RobinsonImaging Urania, Vienna, Austria.
Nancy J FischbeinDivision of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Pim de Graaf7Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne R J PéportéDepartment of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Jussi HirvonenDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Darka Hadnadjev ŠimonjiCenter for Radiology, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Gloria J Guzmán Pérez-CarrilloMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Xin Cynthia WuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Christine GlastonburyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Kristine M MosierDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ashok SrinivasanDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this international survey was to understand how diffusion (DWI) and perfusion imaging (PWI) are being applied to clinical head and neck imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An online questionnaire focusing on acquisition, clinical indications, analysis, and reporting of qualitative DWI (QlDWI), quantitative DWI (QnDWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced PWI (DCE-PWI) in the head and neck was circulated to members of the American Society of Head and Neck Radiology (ASHNR) and European Society of Head and Neck Radiology (ESHNR) over a 3-month period. Descriptive statistics and group comparisons were calculated with SPSS® v27.

resultsThere were 294 unique respondents (17.6% response rate) from 256 institutions (182 ESHNR, 74 ASHNR). DWI was routinely acquired for some head and neck indications at 95.7% of the respondents' institutions, with 92.5% of radiologists interpreting QlDWI but only 36.7% analysing QnDWI. QlDWI was most frequently applied to primary mucosal masses or the middle ear, whilst QnDWI was routinely used to distinguish tumour histologies, and primary or recurrent carcinoma. DCE-PWI was routinely acquired at 53.6% of institutions and used by 40.8% of respondents, however, there was no clinical scenario in which it was routinely applied by most users. DCE-PWI analysis methods varied, with time-intensity curve classifications being the most frequently reported. Lack of standardisation was identified as a key reason for not implementing QnDWI, whilst numerous factors prevented the adoption of DCE-PWI.

conclusionThere is widespread routine interpretation of QlDWI by head and neck radiologists, but there is considerable variation in the application and analysis of head and neck QnDWI and DCE-PWI. KEY POINTS: Question How are diffusion (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging (DCE-PWI) being utilised by head and neck radiologists across a wide range of practices? Findings An international survey demonstrated widespread routine interpretation of qualitative DWI but variable application and analysis of quantitative DWI and DCE-PWI with numerous barriers to implementation. Clinical relevance The survey results will aid discussion on how to standardise and optimally disseminate these MRI techniques in day-to-day practice. More focused education and resource allocation may be required to accelerate the adoption of quantitative DWI and DCE-PWI.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHead and Neck NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Contrast MediaHeadHumansPerfusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingSurveys and QuestionnairesContrast MediaDiffusion imagingMagnetic resonance imagingNeckPerfusion imagingSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39904786
PMCPMC12226617

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.