ArticleScientific reports2025
Panoramic radiographic features for machine learning based detection of mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar canal contact.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal transformer-enhanced deep learning for accurate assessment of mandibular third molar-inferior alveolar canal contact using panoramic radiography and CBCT slices.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Validation of artificial intelligence-assisted CBCT analysis for predicting inferior alveolar nerve proximity to impacted mandibular third molars: a diagnostic accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The optimal diagnostic assistance system for predicting three-dimensional contact between mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal on panoramic radiographs.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Automated assessment and detection of third molar and inferior alveolar nerve relations using UNet and transfer learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study uses machine learning (ML) to elucidate the contact relationship between the mandibular third molar (M3M) and the inferior alveolar canal (IAC), leading to three major contributions; (1) The first publicly accessible PR image dataset with semantic annotations for 1,478 IACs and M3Ms from 1,010 patients is introduced, which includes challenging cases, such as false positive contacts, with CBCT images as the gold standard, (2) Established radiological indicators for M3M-IAC contact were extracted as features using digital image processing, and these features were used as inputs for various ML methods. Eligibility was assessed through statistical analysis and radiologists evaluations. Clinical feedback from radiologists on these features provides insights for future improvements. (3) ANNs, two custom CNNs, seven established DL models, and their combinations were used for automatic M3M-IAC contact determination with extracted features, semantic annotations, and ROIs. The ANN configuration surpassed both radiologists and DL models in specificity (82%), F1 score (92%), and accuracy (85%), while maintaining a comparable sensitivity (86%) to the DL models. This indicates that ANNs can effectively predict M3M-IAC contact relations and are particularly effective at identifying cases with no contact relation between M3M and IAC compared to other ML methods. Future work should focus on developing automated segmentation algorithms for M3M and IAC on PRs, to identify relevant anatomical structures, thereby improving clinical usability. The dataset, feature extraction, and ML codes are available through the CONTACT grand challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.