Trial reportESC heart failure2025
Right ventricular dysfunction for prediction of long-term recovery in de novo HFrEF : a PROLONG-II substudy.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Right ventricular dysfunction for prediction of long-term recovery in de novo HFrEF : a PROLONG-II substudy.ESC heart failure · 2025Trial
- Haemodynamic consequences of acute pulmonary embolism predict risk of CTPA-related acute kidney injury.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical Usefulness of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Artery Coupling in Patients with Heart Failure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Right atrial and right ventricular strain in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a pilot study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo analyse the predictive value of advanced markers of right ventricular (RV) function and RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling in forecasting long-term left ventricular (LV) improvement in de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND
results260 patients (mean age 57 years, 68% men) from the PROLONG-II study were included. PROLONG-II analysed patients with new-onset HFrEF receiving a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator. For this substudy, RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWS), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and right ventricular-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling ratios [RVFWS/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP), TAPSE/PASP and FAC/PASP] at baseline and 3-month follow-up (early follow-up) were examined. LV improvement and non-improvement were defined as an LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of >35% or ≤35% at last available (long-term) follow-up. The median follow-up was 31.5 months (IQR: 18.2-45.4), and 151 (58%) patients experienced LV improvement in the long term. No significant differences of RV function and markers of RV-PA coupling were observed at baseline; however, the subgroup of patients with long-term LVEF improvement showed better RV function at early follow-up (RVFWS -20.9 ± 4.3 vs. -18.5 ± 5.1%, TAPSE 19.7 ± 5.1 vs. 17.4 ± 4.9 mm, FAC 39.7 ± 8.5 vs. 35.2 ± 9.4%, all P < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, RVFWS at early follow-up was shown to be an independent predictor of later LV recovery [odds ratio 1.078 (95% confidence interval 1.010-1.150), P < 0.05]. The non-improvers exhibited worse RV-PA coupling at early follow-up [RVFWS/PASP 0.82 ± 0.35 vs. 0.65 ± 0.35%/mmHg, TAPSE/PASP 0.71 (0.55-1.00) vs. 0.54 (0.35-0.75) mm/mmHg, FAC/PASP 1.54 ± 0.61 vs. 1.24 ± 0.75%/mmHg, all P < 0.01]. RVFWS/PASP identified RV-PA uncoupling was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 4.64, 95% confidence interval 1.34-16.09, P = 0.033).
conclusionsPersistent RV dysfunction, as indicated by both standard and advanced echocardiographic markers during the early follow-up period, implies a reduced potential for long-term LV recovery in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.