ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Construction and validation of risk prediction models for renal replacement therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRenal replacement therapy (RRT) plays a crucial role in managing acute pancreatitis (AP). This study aimed to develop and evaluate predictive models for determining the need for RRT among patients with AP in the intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsA retrospective selection of patients with AP was made from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, version V2.0). The cohort was randomly divided into a training set (447 patients) and a validation set (150 patients). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression cross-validation method was utilized to identify key features for model construction. Using these features, four machine learning (ML) algorithms were developed. The optimal model was visualized and clarified using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and presented as a nomogram.
resultsThe mean age of the cohort was 59.17 years, with an average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 17.55. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was observed in 52.43% of patients with AP, and 9.05% required RRT. After feature selection, four of 41 clinical factors were ultimately chosen for use in model construction. The Lasso-Logistic Regression (Lasso-LR) model showed a high discriminative ability to predict RRT risk in patients with AP, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.955 (95% CI 0.924-0.987) in the training set. In the validation set, it maintained its discriminative performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.985 (95% CI 0.970-1.000). Calibration curves indicated an excellent fit in both sets (Brier scores: 0.039 and 0.032, respectively), suggesting high consistency. Decision curve analysis (DCA) highlighted the Lasso-LR model's significant clinical utility in predicting RRT likelihood in patients with AP.
conclusionsDeveloped via the LASSO regression cross-validation method, the Lasso-LR model significantly excels in predicting the requirement for RRT in patients with AP, demonstrating its potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.