Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906906›Full record

ArticleObesity pillars2025

Comparing clinical practice habits among obesity medicine physicians by patient, physician and clinic factors.

Selvi Rajagopal, Edmond P Wickham, Tirissa J Reid, Dana R Brittan, Judith Korner, Kimberly A Gudzune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity pillars, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Selvi RajagopalJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Edmond P WickhamVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Tirissa J ReidColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Dana R BrittanAmerican Board of Obesity Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
Judith KornerColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Kimberly A GudzuneAmerican Board of Obesity Medicine Foundation, Denver, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While clinical practice habits vary by patient, physician and clinic factors in primary care, limited research has examined whether differences exist in obesity medicine. Our objective was to compare practice habits by such factors among obesity medicine physicians certified by the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM). Methods: We conducted secondary analyses of cross-sectional data from the 2023 ABOM Practice Analysis Validation Survey. We included three obesity medicine practice habits - prescribing anti-obesity medications (AOMs), off-label prescribing of medications for weight reduction, and obesity medicine clinical practice hours (4-20 h/week versus >20 h/week). We included patient (patient population), physician (primary medical specialty, years of obesity medicine experience) and clinic factors (practice setting, geographic catchment, accepts insurance for obesity care). We conducted bivariate analyses using Χ Results: Among 565 ABOM-certified physicians, 71.5 % had primary medical specialties within primary care and 9.2 % predominantly treated children/adolescents with obesity. Overall, 97.5 % prescribed AOMs and 85.1 % prescribed off-label medications for weight reduction. Fewer physicians who predominantly treated children/adolescents prescribed AOMs compared to physicians with no or limited treatment of children (88.5 % versus 98.4 % and 98.5 %, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, 41.4 % reported practicing obesity medicine >20 h/week, which was more likely to occur as years of obesity medicine experience increased (i.e., 21.9 ​% among physicians with 1-2 years of experience versus 58.5 ​% with 10+ years; p ​< ​0.001). No significant differences in practice habits occurred by primary medical specialty, practice setting, geographic catchment, or accepting insurance. Conclusion: Our findings may suggest that ABOM-certified physicians have consistent obesity medication prescribing practices regardless of physician or clinic factors, which may be particularly important to patients seeking pharmacologic treatment. Most ABOM-certified physicians who predominantly treat children/adolescents prescribe obesity medications. These current rates are relatively higher than prior findings among pediatric ABOM-certified physicians, which might help support pharmacologic access for pediatric patients.

Indexed as

Anti-obesity agentsCertificationObesity managementPhysicians’ practice patterns

Identifiers

PMID39906906
PMCPMC11791150

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.