Evidence mapPaperPMID 39907856Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2025

The Impact of Novel Medications for Obesity on Weight Stigma and Societal Attitudes: A Narrative Review.

Berit L Heitmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Berit L HeitmannResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. berit.lilienthal.heitmann@regionh.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review examines the potential implications of the expanded use of novel medications for obesity, particularly the GLP-1 receptor agonists, on weight stigma and societal attitudes towards pharmacologically induced weight loss. It analyses how these medications may potentially contribute to both reducing and exacerbating stigma and discusses strategies to reduce weight bias. RECENT

findingsThe introduction of GLP-1 receptor agonists has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing weight and lead to improved health outcomes for individuals living with obesity. However, while these medications may reduce stigma by framing obesity as a medical issue rather than a personal failure, disparities in access and use related to high costs may inflate existing biases against those who cannot afford treatment. Also, a few studies indicate that users of these medications may feel stigmatised for taking what is perceived as an "easy way out" to lose weight, mirroring historical attitudes towards bariatric surgery. The new medications for obesity may have the potential to reduce obesity stigma by reframing it as a medical condition rather than a moral failing. However, taking legal actions to build a more inclusive society including ensuring equitable access to these medications will be essential in mitigating stigma and help fostering a supportive environment for those living with obesity. Lessons from reducing stigma surrounding other medical conditions suggest that supportive health care and educational campaigns that promote the understanding of obesity as a complex health issue are needed to reshape negative perceptions towards individuals with obesity.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsObesitySocial StigmaHumansWeight LossAnti-Obesity AgentsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGLP-1 receptor analogesStigmaWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID39907856
PMCPMC11799028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.