ReviewCancer letters2025
Temporal myc dynamics permit mitotic bypass, promoting polyploid phenotypes.
Review in Cancer letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RAC1 signaling in polyploid giant cancer cells: Implications for tumorigenesis and therapy resistance.Cancer letters · 2026Review
- Targeting EphA2 under DNA damage causes mitotic bypass via p21 induction.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High Myc phenotypes are extensively documented in the hyperproliferative cell cycle of cancer cells, as well as non-proliferative endoreplication cycles engaged during normal development and stress response. Notably, endoreplication in cancer produces chemotherapy resistant polyploid cells, necessitating a clearer understanding of altered cell cycle regulation that uncouples DNA replication and mitotic cell division. The c-Myc oncogene is a well-established transcriptional regulator of cell cycle progression and has been extensively published as an essential driver of the G1/S transition. Beyond S phase, Myc transcriptionally activates the proteins that drive mitotic entry. Sustained activation of Myc through the cell cycle transcriptionally couples DNA replication and mitotic cell division. Based on the literature in this field, we propose a new model of temporal regulation of Myc activity that serves to either couple or uncouple these two processes, determining cell cycle fate - proliferation or polyploidy. The mitotic cell cycle requires two pulses of Myc activity - the first driving the G1/S transition and the second driving the G2/M transition. During mitosis, Myc activity must be silenced to achieve high-fidelity division. Absence of the second activity pulse during G2 results in the downregulation of the proteins essential for mitotic entry and permits premature activation of APC/C, inducing mitotic bypass. A subsequent rise of Myc activity following mitotic bypass permits genome re-replication, driving polyploid phenotypes. This model serves to provide a new level of understanding to the global regulation of S phase-mitosis coupling, as well as a new lens to view low Myc phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.