ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Efficacy of Fine-Tuned Large Language Model in CT Protocol Assignment as Clinical Decision-Supporting System.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved delineation of the cystic artery using super-resolution deep learning reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Impact of Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction on Low-Dose CT in Patients with Central Venous Catheter or Central Venous Port.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Extracting Pretreatment Pancreatic Cancer According to Computed Tomography Radiology Reports.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of structured output constraints on GPT-5-Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and open-weight LLMs for radiology protocol selection.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Initial Insights Into an Institutional Secure Large Language Model for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination Requests: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- ModernBERT is more efficient than conventional BERT for chest CT findings classification in Japanese radiology reports.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Preoperative Microvascular Invasion Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Comparison with Radiologists and Treatment Outcomes.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a large language model in classifying branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Large Language Models in Detecting Cases Requiring Immediate Reporting in Pediatric Radiology: A Feasibility Study Using Publicly Available Clinical Vignettes.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Fine-tuned large Language model for extracting newly identified acute brain infarcts based on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging reports.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal radiology: practical aspects and latest perspectives.BJR open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate CT protocol assignment is crucial for optimizing medical imaging procedures. The integration of large language models (LLMs) may be helpful, but its efficacy as a clinical decision support system for protocoling tasks remains unknown. This study aimed to develop and evaluate fine-tuned LLM specifically designed for CT protocoling, as well as assess its performance, both standalone and in concurrent use, in terms of effectiveness and efficiency within radiological workflows. This retrospective study included radiology tests for contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT examinations (2829/498/941 for training/validation/testing). Inputs involve the clinical indication section, age, and anatomic coverage. The LLM was fine-tuned for 15 epochs, selecting the best model by macro sensitivity in validation. Performance was then evaluated on 800 randomly selected cases from the test dataset. Two radiology residents and two radiologists assigned CT protocols with and without referencing the output of LLM to evaluate its efficacy as a clinical decision support system. The LLM exhibited high accuracy metrics, with top-1 and top-2 accuracies of 0.923 and 0.963, respectively, and a macro sensitivity of 0.907. It processed each case in an average of 0.39 s. The LLM, as a clinical decision support tool, improved accuracy both for residents (0.913 vs. 0.936) and radiologists (0.920 vs. 0.926 without and with LLM, respectively), with the improvement for residents being statistically significant (p = 0.02). Additionally, it reduced reading times by 14% for residents and 12% for radiologists. These results indicate the potential of LLMs to improve CT protocoling efficiency and diagnostic accuracy in radiological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.