ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Clinical, genomic, and histopathologic diversity in cerebral cavernous malformations.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MEKK3 bridges gut-brain communication and cerebral cavernous malformation pathogenesis.Cell death discovery · 2026Review
- Protective Effect of Glutathione Supplementation On Mouse Ovarian Tissue Vitrification and Autologous Transplantation.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Recurrent somatic copy number alterations in resected cerebral cavernous malformations.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Clinical Significance of Somatic PIK3CA and MAP3K3 Mutations in Cerebral and Spinal Cavernous Malformations.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are hemorrhagic vascular disorders with varied clinical and radiological presentations, occurring sporadically due to MAP3K3 or PIK3CA mutations or through inherited germline mutations of CCM genes. This study aimed to clarify the clinical, genetic, and pathological features of CCMs using a multicenter cohort across three Chinese centers. We analyzed 290 surgical specimens from symptomatic CCM patients, utilizing whole-exome sequencing, droplet digital PCR, and targeted panel sequencing, alongside immunohistology to examine genotypic and phenotypic differences. Among 290 cases, 201 had somatic MAP3K3, PIK3CA, or germline CCM mutations, each associated with distinct clinical parameters: hemorrhage risk (P < 0.001), lesion size (P = 0.019), non-hemorrhagic epilepsy (P < 0.001), Zabramski classifications (P < 0.001), developmental venous anomaly presence (P < 0.001), and MRI-detected edema (P < 0.001). PIK3CA mutations showed a higher hemorrhage risk than MAP3K3 and combined MAP3K3 & PIK3CA mutations (P < 0.001). Within PIK3CA mutations, the p.H1047R variant correlated with higher bleeding risk than p.E545K (P = 0.007). For non-hemorrhagic epilepsy, patients with single MAP3K3 mutations or combined MAP3K3 & PIK3CA mutations were at greater risk than those with PIK3CA mutations alone. Histopathologically, lesions with PIK3CA mutations displayed cyst walls, pS6-positive dilated capillaries, and fresh blood cells, while MAP3K3 and double mutation lesions exhibited classic CCM pathology with SMA-positive and KLF4-positive vessels, collagen, and calcification. PIK3CA lesions had fewer KLF4-positive cells than double mutations lesions (P < 0.001), and EndMT (SMA-positive) cells compared to double mutation lesions (P < 0.05) and MAP3K3 mutations (P < 0.001), with more pS6 compared to MAP3K3 mutations (P < 0.05). This study underscores the diverse clinical, genomic, and histopathological characteristics in CCMs, suggesting potential predictive markers based on mutation subtypes and MRI features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.