SynthesisClinical cardiology2025
Cardiovascular Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic kidney disease-associated cardiomyopathy: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Consensus on the management of hypertension in individuals with diabetes by Asian-Pacific Society of hypertension (APSH) & Diabetes Asia Study Group (DASG).Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Finerenone in kidney transplantation: an underinvestigated agent: review of available evidence, existing gaps, and future directions.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Review
- Impact of β-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction in patients with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2026Review
- Trends and disparities in heart failure mortality with and without chronic kidney disease in a nationwide retrospective analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFinerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, has emerged as a novel therapeutic option for the management of patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or heart failure. We seek to summarize the evidence on the drug's effectiveness regarding cardiovascular (CV) outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a literature search of Pubmed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 2024. Trials exploring the effects of finerenone on CV outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The results of pooled analyses were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsA total of eight trials, incorporating 21 200 patients, were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause death (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99), major adverse CV events (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.90), heart failure-related hospitalizations or unplanned hospital visits (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.87) with finerenone administration compared to control. Finerenone use was associated with a trend of reduced risk of CV death without reaching statistical significance (RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-1.00). The risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.12), adverse events (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03), adverse events leading to discontinuation (RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.96-1.17) remained comparable across both groups. However, an increased risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.88-2.27) was observed with finerenone therapy compared to the control group.
conclusionFinerenone administration was associated with improved CV outcomes in the CV-renmetabolic conditions compared to the control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.