Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911244›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Real-world outcomes of the CROSS regimen in patients with resectable esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.

Hanneke van Laarhoven, Rob Verhoeven, Mark van Berge Henegouwen, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Richard van Hillegersberg, Marije Slingerland, Christina T Muijs, Bas Wijnhoven, Bianca Mostert, Laurens Beerepoot and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Differential Survival Outcomes of Satisfactory Tumour Response (ypStage I) Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy of Oesophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hanneke van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, AZ, 1105, the Netherlands.
Rob VerhoevenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, AZ, 1105, the Netherlands.
Mark van Berge HenegouwenCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment & Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nadia Haj MohammadDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Richard van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marije SlingerlandDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Christina T MuijsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Bas WijnhovenDivision of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bianca MostertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Laurens BeerepootDepartment of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Grard NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Sarah DerksCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment & Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter S N van RossumCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment & Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent studies in patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ)-Neo-AEGIS and ESOPEC-have explored the comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with chemotherapy, with conflicting results. To contextualize the findings from these studies using nCRT as a comparator, we aimed to investigate contemporary real-world outcomes of nCRT in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or GEJ. Methods: From the Netherlands Cancer Registry, patients were selected who were diagnosed between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2022 with a resectable (cT1N+M0 or cT2-4aNanyM0) esophageal, GEJ or gastric cardia adenocarcinoma and started treatment with nCRT according to the CROSS regimen, that is 5 weekly cycles of carboplatin (AUC 2 mg/mL per minute) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m Findings: Of the 4765 included patients, 4170 (87.5%) completed the full CROSS regimen of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A pCR was observed in 704 (20.5%) of 3439 patients who underwent surgical resection within 16 weeks after completing the CROSS regimen. In the complete study population, the median overall survival (OS) was 33.7 months (95% CI 32.0-35.6), with a 3-year OS rate of 48.1%. Interpretation: Although survival rates in real-world settings are often lower compared to clinical trials, in our real-world cohort the 3-year OS was only 2.6% lower compared to that reported for the group that underwent nCRT in ESOPEC. These real-world results underscore the potential of the CROSS regimen in daily clinical practice. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Esophageal adenocarcinomaNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyOverall survivalPathological complete responseReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID39911244
PMCPMC11795631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.