Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911278›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2025

Integrative Bioinformatics Analysis for Targeting Hub Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment.

Indu Priya Gudivada, Krishna Chaitanya Amajala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A tumor-residentiScience · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Indu Priya GudivadaDepartment of Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, 530045, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Krishna Chaitanya AmajalaDepartment of Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, 530045, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The damage in the liver and hepatocytes is where the primary liver cancer begins, and this is referred to as Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). One of the best methods for detecting changes in gene expression of hepatocellular carcinoma is through bioinformatics approaches. Objective: This study aimed to identify potential drug target(s) hubs mediating HCC progression using computational approaches through gene expression and protein-protein interaction datasets. Methodology: Four datasets related to HCC were acquired from the GEO database, and Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) were identified. Using Evenn, the common genes were chosen. Using the Fun Rich tool, functional associations among the genes were identified. Further, protein-protein interaction networks were predicted using STRING, and hub genes were identified using Cytoscape. The selected hub genes were subjected to GEPIA and Shiny GO analysis for survival analysis and functional enrichment studies for the identified hub genes. The up-regulating genes were further studied for immunohistopathological studies using HPA to identify gene/protein expression in normal Results: The GEO2R analysis for the considered datasets identified 735 upregulating and 284 downregulating DEGs. Functional gene associations were identified through the Fun Rich tool. Further, PPIN network analysis was performed using STRING. A comparative study was carried out between the experimental evidence and the other seven data evidence in STRING, revealing that most proteins in the network were involved in protein-protein interactions. Further, through Cytoscape plugins, the ranking of the genes was analyzed, and densely connected regions were identified, resulting in the selection of the top 20 hub genes involved in HCC pathogenesis. The identified hub genes were: KIF2C, CDK1, TPX2, CEP55, MELK, TTK, BUB1, NCAPG, ASPM, KIF11, CCNA2, HMMR, BUB1B, TOP2A, CENPF, KIF20A, NUSAP1, DLGAP5, PBK, and CCNB2. Further, GEPIA and Shiny GO analyses provided insights into survival ratios and functional enrichment studied for the hub genes. The HPA database studies further found that upregulating genes were involved in changes in protein expression in Normal Conclusion: The present study involved various integrated bioinformatics approaches, analyzing gene expression and protein-protein interaction datasets, resulting in the identification of 20 top-ranked hubs involved in the progression of HCC. They are KIF2C, CDK1, TPX2, CEP55, MELK, TTK, BUB1, NCAPG, ASPM, KIF11, CCNA2, HMMR, BUB1B, TOP2A, CENPF, KIF20A, NUSAP1, DLGAP5, PBK, and CCNB2. Gene-chemical interaction network studies uncovered that existing drug molecules, including sorafenib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib, can be used as leads to identify novel drugs, and the identified hub genes can be promising drug targets. The current study underscores the significance of targeting these hub genes and utilizing existing molecules to generate new molecules to combat liver cancer effectively and can be further explored in terms of drug discovery research to develop treatments for HCC.

Indexed as

drug targetsgene expression datasetshub genesinteraction networkLiver canceromics studiessystems biology

Identifiers

PMID39911278
PMCPMC11793067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.