ArticleBiomaterials research2025
Regeneration of a Rabbit Segmental Defect with a New Bone Therapy: Autologous Blood Coagulum with Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6 and Synthetic Ceramics.
Article in Biomaterials research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone Induction as a Function of Size and Chemical Composition of Calcium Phosphate Granules in Osteogrow-C Evaluated in Animal Models: A 1-Year Follow-Up.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Huoxue Jiegu compound capsule accelerates tibial fracture healing via angiogenesis-driven repair mechanisms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Imaging of the Skeletal System: Overview of Applications in Human and Veterinary Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Time to consider fracture nonunion an orphan disease? An update into pathophysiology, epidemiology and therapeutic solutions.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Segmental defects of long bones are among the most challenging and debilitating conditions in clinical medicine. Osteogrow-C is a novel osteoinductive device composed of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 6 (rhBMP6) delivered within autologous blood coagulum (ABC) with calcium phosphate ceramics that was proven efficacious in preclinical models of spinal fusion. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Osteogrow-C in comparison to that of other osteoinductive therapies in a clinically relevant segmental defect model in rabbits. Segmental defects (15 mm) of rabbit ulna were treated with Osteogrow-C containing different synthetic ceramic particles (tricalcium phosphate [TCP] and TCP/hydroxyapatite 40%/60%), Osteogrow (rhBMP6/ABC), Infuse (rhBMP2/absorbable collagen sponge), and control implants without bone morphogenetic proteins. Defect healing was evaluated by in vivo x-ray scans 4, 8, and 17 weeks after the surgery, and animals were killed after 17 weeks for further radiographical and histological assessment. Evaluation of x-ray images, micro-computed tomography, and histological sections revealed that both Osteogrow-C formulations as well as Osteogrow and Infuse promoted healing of the ulnar segmental defect. However, radiographic scores were higher in animals treated with Osteogrow-C than those for the other used therapies. Moreover, evaluation of in vivo x-ray scans revealed that Osteogrow-C with TCP ceramics induced the most rapid defect bridging. On the other hand, control implants (ABC/TCP and ABC/biphasic calcium phosphate) promoted limited osteogenesis without defect bridging. The findings of this study suggest that Osteogrow-C is a promising safe therapeutic solution for the treatment of large bone defects, providing relief to millions of patients suffering from this debilitating condition.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.