ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Better understanding the phenotypic effects of drugs through shared targets in genetic disease networks.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Target-biology and interactome-derived signatures predict target-level associations with safety-related drug attrition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A systems perspective on rare diseases: integrating human phenotype ontology with the Anukta framework of Ayurveda.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Most drugs fail during development and there is a clear and unmet need for approaches to better understand mechanistically how drugs exert both their intended and adverse effects. Gaining traction in this field is the use of disease data linking genes with pathological phenotypes and combining this with drugtarget interaction data. Methods: We introduce methodology to associate drugs with effects, both intended and adverse, using a tripartite network approach that combines drug-target and target-phenotype data, in which targets can be represented as proteins and protein domains. Results: We were able to detect associations for over 140,000 ChEMBL drugs and 3,800 phenotypes, represented as Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms. The overlap of these results with the SIDER databases of known drug side effects was up to 10 times higher than random, depending on the target type, disease database and score threshold used. In terms of overlap with drug-phenotype pairs extracted from the literature, the performance of our methodology was up to 17.47 times greater than random. The top results include phenotype-drug associations that represent intended effects, particularly for cancers such as chronic myelogenous leukemia, which was linked with nilotinib. They also include adverse side effects, such as blurred vision being linked with tetracaine. Discussion: This work represents an important advance in our understanding of how drugs cause intended and adverse side effects through their action on disease causing genes and has potential applications for drug development and repositioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.