ReviewCureus2025
Medical and Surgical Emergencies in Occupational Medicine: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to provide a general resource for occupational health stakeholders. It also serves as a clinical guide for frontline providers and a policy framework for employers and regulators. Medical and surgical emergencies in occupational settings can cause serious harm if not identified and managed early. This review covers trauma, chemical exposures, thermal injuries, respiratory distress, and infectious hazards. We outline clinical signs, diagnostic steps, initial care, and follow-up plans. We also discuss preventive strategies such as hazard assessments and safety protocols. Evidence-based guidelines and practical methods can lower injury and death rates. Our objective is to help stakeholders recognize risks, respond fast, and improve outcomes. Future studies should monitor and examine new threats, such as novel industrial processes and evolving pathogens, to optimize workplace safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.