ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2025
Prognostic Value of Myocardial Parametric Mapping in Patients with Acute Myocarditis: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiparametric CMR in Myocarditis: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Advances, Prognostic Value, and the Challenge of Genetic Mimics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Myocarditis and Non-ICI Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the prognostic value of T1 mapping, extracellular volume fraction (ECV), and T2 mapping in a large cohort of patients with acute myocarditis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with acute myocarditis who underwent cardiac MRI (3.0 T) between March 2016 and October 2022. Diagnosis was confirmed by diagnostic cardiac MRI criteria or endomyocardial biopsy. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as the composite of cardiac death, heart failure hospitalization, heart transplantation, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and recurrent myocarditis. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association of clinical and cardiac MRI variables with the primary end point. The prognostic value of each model was assessed using the Harrell C index. Results A total of 235 patients (mean age, 32 years ± 13 [SD]; 150 [63.8%] men) were included. During a mean follow-up of 1637 days (IQR: 1441-1833 days), MACEs occurred in 45 (19%) patients. Patients with MACEs had higher global native T1, ECV, and T2 values (1342 msec ± 64 vs 1263 msec ± 48;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.