ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2025
Validation of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Recording in Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.
Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Validating exacerbations of asthma in electronic health records: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Sociodemographic differences in clinical phenotypes among patients with COPD: a latent class analysis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Baseline Blood Eosinophil Count and 28-Day in-Hospital Mortality in ICU-Admitted Patients with AECOPD: A Cohort Study with External Validation.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute exacerbations of COPD(AECOPD) can have severe impacts on patients with the disease and a heavy burden on health care resources. Electronic health records (EHRs) are a valuable resource for identifying cases of AECOPD and research. Studies have attempted to validate case definitions of AECOPD and this review aims to summarize validated AECOPD definitions in EHRs and to provide guidance on the best algorithms to use to ensure accurate cohorts of AECOPD cases are available for researchers using EHRs. Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched and studies that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed by ≥2 reviewers. Data extracted included the algorithms used to identify AECOPD, the reference standards used to compare against the algorithm, and measures of validity. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 adapted for this review. Results: Out of 2784 studies found by the search strategy, 12 met the inclusion criteria. The clinical terminology used to build algorithms to detect AECOPD included codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and Tenth Revision (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10), along with the Read codes from United Kingdom general practices. AECOPD can be identified within EHRs using validated definitions, however, the validity of AECOPD definitions varies considerably depending on the algorithm used and the settings to which they are applied. Conclusion: Although there are validated definitions that can be used to identify AECOPD, there is no clear consensus on which provides the highest validity or the most sensitive and specific definition to use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.