SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
The efficacy and safety of low-dose triple combination for hypertension treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Bedtime Versus Morning Dosing of Anti-hypertensives: A GRADE-Assessed Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Evidence.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Low-Dose Triple-Pill of Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Indapamide for Initial Hypertension Treatment: A GRADE-Assessed Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- "Efficacy and safety of low-dose combination (Quad pill and Triple pill) therapy versus standard of care and placebo in controlling hypertension: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials".Journal of human hypertension · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, Low-dose triple single-pill combinations (LDTC) have become a promising option for managing hypertension. This review evaluates LDTC's effectiveness and safety versus standard care, monotherapy, and placebo for blood pressure (BP) control. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, Scopus, and Cochrane from inception to September 2024. The analysis presented risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42024595331. We identified five eligible trials with a total of 1,709 patients. LDTC had a higher rate of achieving BP < 140/90 at 4 to 6 weeks (wk) (RR: 1.56; CI: 1.41, 1.72; p < 0.01) and at 8 to 12 wk (RR: 1.43; CI: 1.31, 1.57; P < 0.01). Additionally, LDTC significantly reduced the automated office systolic BP at 4 to 6 wk (MD: -8.80; CI: -10.16, -7.44; p < 0.01), 8 to 12 wk (MD: -8.30; CI: -11.18, -5.42; P < 0.01), and at 24 wk (MD: -6.94; CI: -10.56, -3.32; P < 0.01). However, LDTC indicated an increased rate of hypokalemia (RR: 2.25; CI: 1.50, 3.38; P < 0.01), with no difference between both groups in total adverse events (AEs) (P = 0.44), serious AEs (P = 0.79), treatment discontinuation due to AEs (P = 0.91), and the AEs of special interest (P = 0.54). LDTC therapy is effective and safe for hypertension management but poses potassium depletion. Further large-scale studies are essential to confirm its clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.