Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912900›Full record

SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

The efficacy and safety of low-dose triple combination for hypertension treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mohamed S Elgendy, Hosam I Taha, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Yehya Khlidj, Mohamed R Ezz, Mohamed A Elgamasy, Ahmed Almezaine, Mohamed A Faheem, Islam Rajab, Mohamed Abuelazm

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Bedtime Versus Morning Dosing of Anti-hypertensives: A GRADE-Assessed Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Evidence.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Low-Dose Triple-Pill of Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Indapamide for Initial Hypertension Treatment: A GRADE-Assessed Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed S Elgendy *Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. dr.elgendy.mo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3080-2875
Hosam I Taha *Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Ahmed Mazen AminFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Yehya KhlidjFaculty of Medicine, Algiers University 1, Algiers, Algeria.
Mohamed R EzzFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mohamed A ElgamasyFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Ahmed AlmezaineFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mohamed A FaheemFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Islam RajabInternal Medicine Department, St Joseph University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA.
Mohamed AbuelazmFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, Low-dose triple single-pill combinations (LDTC) have become a promising option for managing hypertension. This review evaluates LDTC's effectiveness and safety versus standard care, monotherapy, and placebo for blood pressure (BP) control. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, Scopus, and Cochrane from inception to September 2024. The analysis presented risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42024595331. We identified five eligible trials with a total of 1,709 patients. LDTC had a higher rate of achieving BP < 140/90 at 4 to 6 weeks (wk) (RR: 1.56; CI: 1.41, 1.72; p < 0.01) and at 8 to 12 wk (RR: 1.43; CI: 1.31, 1.57; P < 0.01). Additionally, LDTC significantly reduced the automated office systolic BP at 4 to 6 wk (MD: -8.80; CI: -10.16, -7.44; p < 0.01), 8 to 12 wk (MD: -8.30; CI: -11.18, -5.42; P < 0.01), and at 24 wk (MD: -6.94; CI: -10.56, -3.32; P < 0.01). However, LDTC indicated an increased rate of hypokalemia (RR: 2.25; CI: 1.50, 3.38; P < 0.01), with no difference between both groups in total adverse events (AEs) (P = 0.44), serious AEs (P = 0.79), treatment discontinuation due to AEs (P = 0.91), and the AEs of special interest (P = 0.54). LDTC therapy is effective and safe for hypertension management but poses potassium depletion. Further large-scale studies are essential to confirm its clinical benefits.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsDrug CombinationsAnti-hypertensiveBlood pressureCardiovascularClinical trialLow-doseSingle pill combination

Identifiers

PMID39912900
PMCPMC12263486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.