Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913056›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2025

A Scoping Review of Preclinical Environmental Enrichment Protocols in Models of Poststroke to Set the Foundations for Translating the Paradigm to Clinical Settings.

Luca Oppici, Guna Bērziņa, Ann Marie Hestetun-Mandrup, Marianne Løvstad, Arve Opheim, Matheus M Pacheco, Lena Rafsten, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, PEER-HOMEcare consortium, James R Rudd

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07517120 (Pedagogy and Enriched Environment for Rehabilitation in the Home After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07517120 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Pedagogy and Enriched Environment for Rehabilitation in the Home After Stroke (PEER-HOMEcare): Study Protocol for a Single-Group Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian School of Sport SciencesRan2026 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsStrokeArmsEnvironmental Mapping Tool (using S.T.E.P.S), Daily Diary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luca OppiciDepartment of Teacher Education and Outdoor Studies, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863, Oslo, Norway. lucao@nih.no.
Guna BērziņaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Ann Marie Hestetun-MandrupSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1450, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
Marianne LøvstadSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1450, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
Arve OpheimSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1450, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
Matheus M PachecoFaculty of Sport, University of Porto, CIFI2D, Porto, Portugal.
Lena RafstenInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Dept of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Katharina S SunnerhagenInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Dept of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
PEER-HOMEcare consortium
James R RuddDepartment of Teacher Education and Outdoor Studies, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863, Oslo, Norway. jamesr@nih.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The translation of the highly effective Environmental Enrichment (EE) paradigm from preclinical animal models to human clinical settings has been slow and showed inconsistent results. The primary translational challenge lies in defining what constitutes an EE for humans. To tackle this challenge, this study conducted a scoping review of preclinical EE protocols to explore what constitutes EE for animal models of stroke, laying the foundation for the translation of EE to human application. A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that conducted an EE intervention in the post-stroke animal model. A total of 116 studies were included in the review. A critical reflection of the characteristics of the included studies revealed that EE for post-stroke is a strategy that frequently modifies the animals' daily environment to create a richness of spatial, structural, and/or social opportunities to engage in a variety of daily life-related motor, cognitive, and social exploratory activities. These activities are relevant to the inhabiting individual and involve the activation of the body function(s) affected by the stroke. This review also identified six principles that underpinned the EE protocols: complexity (spatial and social), variety, novelty, targeting needs, scaffolding, and integration of rehabilitation tasks. These findings can be used as steppingstones to define what constitutes EE in human clinical applications and to develop a set of principles that can inform the design of EE protocols for patients after a stroke.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalEnvironmentStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansEnriched environmentNeuroplasticityStroke rehabilitationTranslational

Identifiers

PMID39913056
PMCPMC12391244

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.