ArticleScientific reports2025
Generalizability of machine learning models for diabetes detection a study with nordic islet transplant and PIMA datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a global health challenge, and accurate early detection is critical for effective management. The study explores the potential of machine learning for improved diabetes prediction using microarray gene expression data and PIMA data set. Researchers utilizing a hybrid feature extraction method such as Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) followed by metaheuristic feature selection algorithms as Harmonic Search (HS), Dragonfly Algorithm (DFA), Elephant Herding Algorithm (EHA). Evaluated the performance of a system by using the following classifiers as Non-Linear Regression-NLR, Linear Regression-LR, Gaussian Mixture Model-GMM, Expectation Maximization-EM, Bayesian Linear Discriminant Analysis-BLDA, Softmax Discriminant Classifier-SDC, and Support Vector Machine with Radial Basis Function kernel-SVM-RBF classifier on two publicly available datasets namely the Nordic Islet Transplant Program (NITP) and the PIMA Indian Diabetes Dataset (PIDD). The findings demonstrate significant improvement in classification accuracy compared to using all genes. On the Nordic islet transplant dataset, the combined ABC-PSO feature extraction with EHO feature selection achieved the highest accuracy of 97.14%, surpassing the 94.28% accuracy obtained with ABC alone and EHO selection. Similarly, on the PIMA Indian diabetes dataset, the ABC-PSO and EHO combination achieved the best accuracy of 98.13%, exceeding the 95.45% accuracy with ABC and DFA selection. These results highlight the effectiveness of our proposed approach in identifying the most informative features for accurate diabetes prediction. It is observed that the parametric values attained for the datasets are almost similar. Therefore, this research indicates the robustness of the FE and FS along with classifier techniques with two different datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.