ArticleScientific reports2025
Electrophysiologically calibrated optogenetic stimulation of dentate granule cells mitigates dendritic spine loss in denervated organotypic entorhino-hippocampal slice cultures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optogenetic Strategies for Motor Recovery After Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organotypic slice cultures (OTCs) are versatile tools for studying long-term structure-function relationships of neurons within a defined network (e.g. hippocampus). We developed a method for repeated experimenter-controlled activation of hippocampal granule cells (GCs) in OTCs within the incubator. After several days of contact-free photonic stimulation, we were able to ameliorate entorhinal denervation-induced structural damage in GCs. To achieve this outcome, we had to calibrate the intensity and duration of optogenetic (light) pulses using whole-cell electrophysiological recordings and multi-cell calcium imaging. Our findings showed that ChR2-expressing cells generated action potentials (APs) or calcium transients in response to illumination but were otherwise functionally indistinguishable from non-transduced GCs within the same neural circuit. However, the threshold for AP firing in single GCs varied based on the stimulus light intensity and the expression levels of ChR2. This information allowed us to calibrate light intensity for chronic stimulations. Denervated GCs exhibited significant spine loss four days post-denervation, but this detrimental effect was mitigated when AP firing was induced at a physiological GC bursting rate. Phototoxic damage caused by chronic light exposure was significantly reduced if illuminated with longer wavelength and by adding antioxidants to the culture medium. Our study presents a versatile approach for concurrent non-invasive manipulation and observation of neural circuit activity and remodeling in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.