Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915975›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

A Calibrated Sensitivity Analysis for Weighted Causal Decompositions.

Andy A Shen, Elina Visoki, Ran Barzilay, Samuel D Pimentel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Causal Inference in Health Disparities Research.Annual review of public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andy A ShenDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-3375
Elina VisokiChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ran BarzilayChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Samuel D PimentelDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

Funding

The Center for Enhancing Triage and Utilization for Depression and Emergent Suicidality (ETUDES) in Pediatric Primary CareP50MH115838 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Charles Richard Jonassaint · 2018 to 2026
$25.5M
Prospective predictors of risk and resilience trajectories of mental health in US youth during COVID-19R21MH130797 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI BARZILAY, RAN · 2023 to 2024
$490k
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention SRG-0-006-22National Science Foundation 2142146National Science Foundation 2146752NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115838NIMH NIH HHS P50MH115838NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH130797NIMH NIH HHS R21MH130797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparities in health or well-being experienced by minority groups can be difficult to study using the traditional exposure-outcome paradigm in causal inference, since potential outcomes in variables such as race or sexual minority status are challenging to interpret. Causal decomposition analysis addresses this gap by positing causal effects on disparities under interventions to other intervenable exposures that may play a mediating role in the disparity. While invoking weaker assumptions than causal mediation approaches, decomposition analyses are often conducted in observational settings and require uncheckable assumptions that eliminate unmeasured confounders. Leveraging the marginal sensitivity model, we develop a sensitivity analysis for weighted causal decomposition estimators and use the percentile bootstrap to construct valid confidence intervals for causal effects on disparities. We also propose a two-parameter reformulation that enhances interpretability and facilitates an intuitive understanding of the plausibility of unmeasured confounders and their effects. We illustrate our framework on a study examining the effect of parental support on disparities in suicidal ideation among sexual minority youth. We find that the effect is small and sensitive to unmeasured confounding, suggesting that further screening studies are needed to identify mitigating interventions in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

CausalityHealth Status DisparitiesAdolescentConfidence IntervalsConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansMaleMediation AnalysisModels, StatisticalSexual and Gender MinoritiesSuicidal Ideationcausal decompositionscausal inferencedisparitiessensitivity analysisweighting

Identifiers

PMID39915975
PMCPMC11810048

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.