ArticleJournal of fish biology2025
A common garden experiment in the wild reveals heritable differences in migration tendencies among brown trout populations.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A common garden experiment in the wild reveals heritable differences in migration tendencies among brown trout populations.Journal of fish biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We undertook a common garden experiment in the Burrishoole catchment, western Ireland, to test for heritable life-history differences among neighboring brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) populations that exhibit neutral genetic divergence. Experimental crosses were made using either local females (obtained from a below-waterfalls section of the Rough River within the Burrishoole) or females from the Erriff River-a neighboring catchment that currently produces a stronger run of anadromous migrants than the Burrishoole. Each female was mated to three different types of males: Rough Below-Falls, Rough Above-Falls (resident males obtained from above the waterfalls), and Erriff. Offspring from the resulting six crosses were introduced as unfed fry into a stretch of the Rough River bounded upstream by the waterfalls and downstream by a Wolf-type fish trap (Rough River Downstream Trap, RRDT). Genetic parentage analysis (16 microsatellite markers) was then used to assign offspring sampled at various time points and locations back to cross type. No differences in parr survival rates (electrofishing in the Rough River) were found among the crosses, but parr moving downstream (intercepted at the RRDT) were skewed toward the Erriff female × Erriff male cross, with a deficit assigning to the Rough Below-Falls female × Rough Above-Falls male cross. Smolts leaving fresh water (sampled at two sea-entry traps) were assigned disproportionately to crosses involving one or two Erriff parents. Offspring from pure Burrishoole crosses were more likely to become putative spawners than those from crosses involving one or two Erriff parents, pointing toward possible local adaptation. These results are consistent with heritable variation in migratory tendencies-a key aspect of intraspecific biodiversity that warrants protection-and with previous suggestions that the Burrishoole system may have evolved recently toward reduced anadromy following a novel and catastrophic anthropogenic change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.