Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917707›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in dental medicine2024

Antibiofilm efficacy of plant extracts as root canal irrigants in endodontics: a systematic literature review.

Jihad Diouchi, Babacar Touré, Sonia Ghoul

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Bibliometric Analysis of Plant-Derived Irrigants, Intracanal Medicaments, and Natural Compounds Against Enterococcus faecalis in Endodontics.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jihad DiouchiInternational Faculty of Dental Medicine, Health Sciences Research Center (CReSS), College of Health Sciences, International University of Rabat, Sala-Al Jadida, Morocco.
Babacar TouréInternational Faculty of Dental Medicine, Health Sciences Research Center (CReSS), College of Health Sciences, International University of Rabat, Sala-Al Jadida, Morocco.
Sonia GhoulInternational Faculty of Dental Medicine, Health Sciences Research Center (CReSS), College of Health Sciences, International University of Rabat, Sala-Al Jadida, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To explore the antibiofilm efficacy of plant extracts against Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched up to April 2024. Studies investigating the antibiofilm efficacy, of at least one plant extract and one conventional root canal irrigant, against endodontic biofilms were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. Data were extracted, and studies were critically assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Results: Among 78 articles, eight articles met the criteria and were eventually included in this review. One study showed a high risk of bias, six showed a moderate risk of bias, and one showed a low risk. A total of twelve plant extracts were tested for their antibiofilm efficacy against eight different single-species biofilms and one multispecies biofilm. A combination of microscopy methods and culturing techniques was used for the assessment of their efficacies. Plant extracts exhibited either a biofilm disruption and/or inhibition of biofilm formation. Psidium cattleianum extract and Psidium guajava exhibited enhanced efficacy compared to Chlorhexidine and NaOCl, respectively. Allium sativum demonstrated comparable efficacy to NaOCl. Furthermore, the combination of Cymbopogon martinii essential oil and NaOCl was found to be more effective than either alone when tested on a multispecies biofilm. However, the other plant extracts, such as Mikania Sprengel, Salvadora persica, Camellia sinensis, and Vitis vinifera showed efficacy but were still inferior compared to the control group. Conclusions: Overall, the tested plant extracts demonstrated promising potential for combating

Indexed as

biofilmendodontic infectionessential oilplant extractroot canal irrigantsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39917707
PMCPMC11797888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.