ArticlePloS one2025
Risk factors for loss to follow-up in patients with gout: A Korean prospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGout, a common form of inflammatory arthritis, is often managed with urate-lowering therapy, but many patients only adhere to treatment during gout attacks, resulting in poor follow-up and suboptimal management. This study aimed to identify characteristics associated with loss to follow-up (LTFU) and develop strategies for better patient management.
methodsData were analyzed from the Urate Lowering TheRApy in gout (ULTRA) registry, a prospective cohort of Korean gout patients recruited since September 2021. Patients aged 18 or older who met the 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were included. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, lifestyle habits, comorbidities, and quality of life assessments using the Korean Gout Impact Scale (K-GIS) and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) were collected at baseline, six months, and annually. LTFU was defined as missing a clinic visit for more than a year. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with LTFU.
resultsAmong 269 patients, 125 (46.5%) were classified as LTFU. Patients not lost to follow-up experienced more frequent gout attacks (P = 0.020) and expressed greater concerns about future flares (P = 0.034). In contrast, LTFU patients had higher levels of anxiety (P = 0.049), depressive symptoms (P = 0.009), impaired mobility (P = 0.002), and a higher EQ-5D score (P = 0.002). Logistic regression identified frequent gout attacks, concerns about attacks, anxiety, impaired mobility, and EQ-5D scores as significant predictors of LTFU.
conclusionFewer gout attacks, heightened anxiety and depression, and lower quality of life were key factors associated with LTFU. Providing emotional support and comprehensive education may enhance follow-up and improve gout management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.