Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920205›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging LLMs and wearables to provide personalized recommendations for enhancing student well-being and academic performance through a proof of concept.

Arfan Ahmed, Sarah Aziz, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Rawan AlSaad, Javaid Sheikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Scoping Review of Large Language Models in Personal Sleep Wellness.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arfan AhmedAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar. ara4013@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Sarah AzizAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Alaa Abd-AlrazaqAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Rawan AlSaadAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Javaid SheikhAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional one-size-fits-all recommendations for student well-being and academic success may not be optimal. Personalized recommendations based on individual data hold promise. This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate personalized recommendations for 12 high school students to enhance their well-being and academic performance. We analyzed data from 12 students, including Fitbit data (activity levels, sleep and stress scores), PSQI surveys (sleep quality), and school reports (grades, teacher observations). An LLM model was used to analyze this data and create personalized recommendations for each student. Validator scoring assessed the clarity, actionability, and alignment of recommendations with student data. The LLM generated various recommendations based on different student data profiles (e.g., low activity levels, poor sleep quality). Validation results indicated that the recommendations were generally clear and actionable, with high ratings in both areas, though alignment with student data showed more variability, suggesting areas for improvement. This study demonstrates the potential of LLMs to generate personalized recommendations based on student data, acknowledging the need for further validation with initial validator feedback indicating their value. However, improvements are needed at every stage, including enhancing prompts, refining models, and incorporating advanced data analytics and continuous feedback. Future research, particularly with intervention groups and potentially RCT studies, is crucial to establish causal relationships and validate the recommendations' impact. As this technology evolves, ensuring ethical considerations and data privacy remains essential.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceStudentsWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleProof of Concept StudySchoolsSleepSleep QualitySurveys and QuestionnairesAcademic performanceLarge Language models (LLMs)Personalized recommendationsSchool reportsStudent well-beingSurveysWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID39920205
PMCPMC11806094

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.