ArticleScientific reports2025
Leveraging LLMs and wearables to provide personalized recommendations for enhancing student well-being and academic performance through a proof of concept.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for the Analysis of Biometric Data from Wearables in Education: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Knowledge-grounded large language model for personalized sports training plan generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of Large Language Models in Personal Sleep Wellness.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Review
- Evaluating the role of large language models in traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment recommendations.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional one-size-fits-all recommendations for student well-being and academic success may not be optimal. Personalized recommendations based on individual data hold promise. This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate personalized recommendations for 12 high school students to enhance their well-being and academic performance. We analyzed data from 12 students, including Fitbit data (activity levels, sleep and stress scores), PSQI surveys (sleep quality), and school reports (grades, teacher observations). An LLM model was used to analyze this data and create personalized recommendations for each student. Validator scoring assessed the clarity, actionability, and alignment of recommendations with student data. The LLM generated various recommendations based on different student data profiles (e.g., low activity levels, poor sleep quality). Validation results indicated that the recommendations were generally clear and actionable, with high ratings in both areas, though alignment with student data showed more variability, suggesting areas for improvement. This study demonstrates the potential of LLMs to generate personalized recommendations based on student data, acknowledging the need for further validation with initial validator feedback indicating their value. However, improvements are needed at every stage, including enhancing prompts, refining models, and incorporating advanced data analytics and continuous feedback. Future research, particularly with intervention groups and potentially RCT studies, is crucial to establish causal relationships and validate the recommendations' impact. As this technology evolves, ensuring ethical considerations and data privacy remains essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.