ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
A generative whole-brain segmentation model for positron emission tomography images.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amyloid PET quantification with deep learning segmentation models without MRI.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWhole-brain segmentation via positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is crucial for advancing neuroscience research and clinical medicine, providing essential insights into biological metabolism and activity within different brain regions. However, the low resolution of PET images may have limited the segmentation accuracy of multiple brain structures. Therefore, we propose a generative multi-object segmentation model for brain PET images to achieve automatic and accurate segmentation.
methodsIn this study, we propose a generative multi-object segmentation model for brain PET images with two learning protocols. First, we pretrained a latent mapping model to learn the mapping relationship between PET and MR images so that we could extract anatomical information of the brain. A 3D multi-object segmentation model was subsequently proposed to apply whole-brain segmentation to MR images generated from integrated latent mapping models. Moreover, a custom cross-attention module based on a cross-attention mechanism was constructed to effectively fuse the functional information and structural information. The proposed method was compared with various deep learning-based approaches in terms of the Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard index, precision, and recall serving as evaluation metrics.
resultsExperiments were conducted on real brain PET/MR images from 120 patients. Both visual and quantitative results indicate that our method outperforms the other comparison approaches, achieving 75.53% ± 4.26% Dice, 66.02% ± 4.55% Jaccard, 74.64% ± 4.15% recall and 81.40% ± 2.30% precision. Furthermore, the evaluation of the SUV distribution and correlation assessment in the regions of interest demonstrated consistency with the ground truth. Additionally, clinical tolerance rates, which are determined by the tumor background ratio, have confirmed the ability of the method to distinguish highly metabolic regions accurately from normal regions, reinforcing its clinical applicability.
conclusionFor automatic and accurate whole-brain segmentation, we propose a novel 3D generative multi-object segmentation model for brain PET images, which achieves superior model performance compared with other deep learning methods. In the future, we will apply our whole-brain segmentation method to clinical practice and extend it to other multimodal tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.