Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39921360›Full record

ReviewBioelectromagnetics2025

Recommendations for the Safe Application of Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Brain Part I: Principles of Electrical Neuromodulation and Adverse Effects.

Antonino M Cassarà, Taylor H Newton, Katie Zhuang, Sabine J Regel, Peter Achermann, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Niels Kuster, Esra Neufeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioelectromagnetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonino M CassaràFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-7440
Taylor H NewtonFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-8702
Katie ZhuangFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sabine J RegelTI Solutions AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter AchermannFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alvaro Pascual-LeoneTI Solutions AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niels KusterFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Esra NeufeldFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a new form of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) that has been proposed as a method for targeted, non-invasive stimulation of deep brain structures. While TIS holds promise for a variety of clinical and non-clinical applications, little data is yet available regarding its effects in humans and its mechanisms of action. In order to inform the design and safe conduct of experiments involving TIS, researchers require quantitative guidance regarding safe exposure limits and other safety considerations. To this end, we undertook a two-part effort to determine frequency-dependent thresholds for applied currents below which TIS is unlikely to pose risk to humans in terms of heating or unwanted stimulation. Part I of this effort, described here, comprises a summary of the current knowledge pertaining to the safety of TIS and related techniques. Specifically, we provide: i) a broad overview of the electrophysiological impacts neurostimulation, ii) a review of the (bio-)physical principles underlying the mechanisms of action of transcranial alternating/direct stimulation (tACS/tDCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and TIS, and iii) a comprehensive survey of the adverse effects (AEs) associated with each technique as reported in the scientific literature and regulatory and clinical databases. In Part II, we perform an in silico study to determine field exposure metrics for tDCS/tACS and DBS under normal (safe) operating conditions and infer frequency-dependent current thresholds for TIS that result in equivalent levels of exposure.

Indexed as

BrainSafetyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationDeep Brain StimulationHumansTime Factorsdeep brain stimulationelectromagnetic simulationsneurostimulationsafety guidelinestemporal interference

Identifiers

PMID39921360
PMCPMC11806287

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.