ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Model-Informed Selection of the Recommended Phase 2 Dosage for Anti-TIGIT Immunotherapy Leveraging co-Expressed PD-1 Inhibitor Target Engagement.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refining dose projections requires a deep understanding of drug-target relationships at the site of action, which is often challenging to achieve. Here we present a case study of how one can refine dose projections for a TIGIT-targeted immunotherapy by leveraging information from the well-studied PD-1 pathway since the co-expression of PD-1 and TIGIT on immune cells provides a unique opportunity to extrapolate data from one target to inform the dosing strategy for the other. We develop a fit-for-purpose mathematical model that captures the experimentally observed relationship between the concentration of a mouse PD-1 antagonist in the plasma and PD-1 target engagement within the tumor microenvironment (TME). We then assess the applicability of this PD-1 model to elucidate the relationship between drug concentration and target engagement for tiragolumab, an anti-TIGIT antibody, across various doses. This analysis aims to refine our understanding of the dose-response relationship for targeting TIGIT, a critical step in optimizing therapeutic efficacy, without conducting additional experiments. The approach is then extended to project efficacious doses for M6223, another anti-TIGIT antibody, using the established PD-1 model, by leveraging the M6223 clinical PK and PD data, as well as virtual population analysis. This work provides a case study of a possible framework for refining dose projections via quantitative estimation of drug-target relationship at the site of action by leveraging established drug-target relationships. Through extrapolating information from a well-characterized pathway, we offer a method to inform dose optimization strategies with limited data using model-informed drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.