Evidence mapPaperPMID 39923968Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025

Improving entity recognition using ensembles of deep learning and fine-tuned large language models: A case study on adverse event extraction from VAERS and social media.

Yiming Li, Deepthi Viswaroopan, William He, Jianfu Li, Xu Zuo, Hua Xu, Cui Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ETT-CKGE: Efficient Task-driven Tokens for Continual Knowledge Graph Embedding.Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases : European Conference, ECML PKDD ... : proceedings. ECML PKDD (Conference) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Large Language Models Struggle in Token-Level Clinical Named Entity Recognition.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiming LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Deepthi ViswaroopanMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
William HeDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, 305 Tower Engineering Building, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Jianfu LiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Xu ZuoMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Hua XuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Cui TaoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. Electronic address: Tao.Cui@mayo.edu.

Funding

VIOLIN 2.0: Vaccine Information and Ontology LInked kNowledgebaseU24AI171008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yongqun He, Junguk Hur · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI171008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdverse event (AE) extraction following COVID-19 vaccines from text data is crucial for monitoring and analyzing the safety profiles of immunizations, identifying potential risks and ensuring the safe use of these products. Traditional deep learning models are adept at learning intricate feature representations and dependencies in sequential data, but often require extensive labeled data. In contrast, large language models (LLMs) excel in understanding contextual information, but exhibit unstable performance on named entity recognition (NER) tasks, possibly due to their broad but unspecific training. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs and traditional deep learning models in AE extraction, and to assess the impact of ensembling these models on performance.

methodsIn this study, we utilized reports and posts from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) (n = 230), Twitter (n = 3,383), and Reddit (n = 49) as our corpora. Our goal was to extract three types of entities: vaccine, shot, and adverse event (ae). We explored and fine-tuned (except GPT-4) multiple LLMs, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Llama-2 7b, and Llama-2 13b, as well as traditional deep learning models like Recurrent neural network (RNN) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers for Biomedical Text Mining (BioBERT). To enhance performance, we created ensembles of the three models with the best performance. For evaluation, we used strict and relaxed F1 scores to evaluate the performance for each entity type, and micro-average F1 was used to assess the overall performance.

resultsThe ensemble demonstrated the best performance in identifying the entities "vaccine," "shot," and "ae," achieving strict F1-scores of 0.878, 0.930, and 0.925, respectively, and a micro-average score of 0.903. These results underscore the significance of fine-tuning models for specific tasks and demonstrate the effectiveness of ensemble methods in enhancing performance.

conclusionIn conclusion, this study demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of ensembling fine-tuned traditional deep learning models and LLMs, for extracting AE-related information following COVID-19 vaccination. This study contributes to the advancement of natural language processing in the biomedical domain, providing valuable insights into improving AE extraction from text data for pharmacovigilance and public health surveillance.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCOVID-19 VaccinesData MiningDeep LearningSocial MediaCOVID-19HumansLarge Language ModelsNatural Language ProcessingSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesDeep learningGenerative pre-trained transformer (GPT)Large language model (LLM)Named-entity recognitionSocial mediaVAERS

Identifiers

PMID39923968
PMCPMC13075790

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.