Evidence mapPaperPMID 39924190Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental ophthalmology2025

Detecting Glaucoma in Highly Myopic Eyes From Fundus Photographs Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Xiaohong Chen, Chen Zhou, Yingting Zhu, Man Luo, Lingjing Hu, Wenjing Han, Chengguo Zuo, Zhidong Li, Hui Xiao, Shaofen Huang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xiaohong ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5630-1414
Chen ZhouYanjing Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yingting ZhuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.
Man LuoSchool of Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lingjing HuYanjing Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenjing HanYanjing Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chengguo ZuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0194-3345
Zhidong LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.
Hui XiaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.
Shaofen HuangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.
Xuhao ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.
Xiujuan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.
Lin LuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.
Yizhou WangSchool of Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yehong ZhuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for eye Care and Vision, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3247-7199

Funding

Major Science and Technology Project of Zhongshan City 2022A1007National Key Research and Development Program of China 2020YFA0112701National Natural Science Foundation of China 62202318Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2024A1515013058R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission KM202310025015Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China 202206080005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh myopia (HM) is a major risk factor for glaucoma. However, glaucomatous optic neuropathy is often undiagnosed owing to atypical structural alterations with axial elongation. Moreover, an algorithm to detect glaucoma in highly myopic eyes has not yet been reported.

methodsWe recruited 2643 colour fundus photographs to train a ResNet-50 network for discriminating eyes with highly myopic glaucoma (HMG) from HM or glaucoma alone. We employed a 10-fold cross-validation strategy to evaluate the model's performance and applicability across diverse patient groups. Multiple metrics were computed to gauge the model's diagnostic process. The diagnostic ability of the model was then juxtaposed with those made by ophthalmologists to determine concordance. The gradient-weighted class activation maps were used for visual explanations.

resultsOur model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 97.7% with an area under the curve of 98.6% (sensitivity, 91.2%; specificity, 98.0%) for the differential diagnosis among HM, glaucoma, HMG and normal controls. These metrics notably outperformed the diagnostic performances of two attending ophthalmologists, who achieved accuracies of 64.7% and 69.9%. The activation maps derived from the model suggested that the most discriminative lesions for diagnosing HMG were predominantly in the disc, peripapillary area and inferior region of the disc, which are often displayed with a tessellated fundus. These results were slightly different from the understanding of the attending ophthalmologists.

conclusionsOur proposed model demonstrates high efficacy and suggests specific features for distinguishing eyes with HMG, enabling potential clinical value in assisting the intricate diagnosis of this vision-threatening disease.

Indexed as

GlaucomaMyopia, DegenerativeNeural Networks, ComputerPhotographyAdultAgedAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleFundus OculiHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOptic DiskROC Curveconvolutional neural networkfundus photographglaucomamyopia

Identifiers

PMID39924190
PMCPMC12235103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.