ArticleClinical & experimental ophthalmology2025
Detecting Glaucoma in Highly Myopic Eyes From Fundus Photographs Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on multi-stage deep learning based intelligent diagnosis of skin diseases and skin medicine diagnosis community construction concept.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interaction of Myopic Optic Neuropathy (MON) and Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy (GON): Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Radiomics and deep learning model based on X-ray imaging for the assisted diagnosis of early Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh myopia (HM) is a major risk factor for glaucoma. However, glaucomatous optic neuropathy is often undiagnosed owing to atypical structural alterations with axial elongation. Moreover, an algorithm to detect glaucoma in highly myopic eyes has not yet been reported.
methodsWe recruited 2643 colour fundus photographs to train a ResNet-50 network for discriminating eyes with highly myopic glaucoma (HMG) from HM or glaucoma alone. We employed a 10-fold cross-validation strategy to evaluate the model's performance and applicability across diverse patient groups. Multiple metrics were computed to gauge the model's diagnostic process. The diagnostic ability of the model was then juxtaposed with those made by ophthalmologists to determine concordance. The gradient-weighted class activation maps were used for visual explanations.
resultsOur model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 97.7% with an area under the curve of 98.6% (sensitivity, 91.2%; specificity, 98.0%) for the differential diagnosis among HM, glaucoma, HMG and normal controls. These metrics notably outperformed the diagnostic performances of two attending ophthalmologists, who achieved accuracies of 64.7% and 69.9%. The activation maps derived from the model suggested that the most discriminative lesions for diagnosing HMG were predominantly in the disc, peripapillary area and inferior region of the disc, which are often displayed with a tessellated fundus. These results were slightly different from the understanding of the attending ophthalmologists.
conclusionsOur proposed model demonstrates high efficacy and suggests specific features for distinguishing eyes with HMG, enabling potential clinical value in assisting the intricate diagnosis of this vision-threatening disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.