ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2025
Supporting Breastmilk Feeding for Infants in Foster Care: A Scoping Review.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, around 2.7 million children are not in the care of their parents, and access to breastmilk is often absent from foster care policies. We aimed to explore the evidence available on how foster families, health and social workers and mothers with infants in care can be supported in providing breastfeeding and expressed breastmilk (EBM), and to identify barriers and facilitators for breastfeeding and EMB in foster care. The JBI methodology for scoping reviews was used. Three academic databases and grey literature were searched in March 2023, and data extraction charts were used. The findings were synthesised using thematic analysis. In total, 11 papers were included, 5 peer-reviewed papers and 6 from the grey literature. Five themes were identified in the analysis: 'Is this safe?', 'Substance use: Protecting the breastfeeding rights of mothers and infants', 'Making milk accessible through breastfeeding and EBM', 'Where are the policies'? and 'Attitudes around breastfeeding'. The findings showed concern from foster parents around the safety of breastmilk and the challenges of supporting breastmilk provision when infants are in foster care. Training, positive attitudes and multi-disciplinary team involvement can support breastfeeding and the breastfeeding rights for infants in foster care. Health and social care professionals who support mothers and foster families with breastfeeding and EBM feeding lack knowledge and guidance in how to do this safely and with a rights-based approach. We found that facilitating breastfeeding is not prioritised when an infant is placed into foster care and that the breastfeeding rights of mothers and infants require urgent attention in policies and guidelines to facilitate safe and person-centred infant feeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.