Evidence mapPaperPMID 39925554Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in Identifying Retinal Conditions Through Classification of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Images.

Rohin R Teegavarapu, Harshal A Sanghvi, Triya Belani, Gurnoor S Gill, K V Chalam, Shailesh Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rohin R TeegavarapuDepartment of Science, American Heritage High School, Delray Beach, USA.
Harshal A SanghviDepartment of Technology and Clinical Trials, Advanced Research, Deerfield Beach, USA.
Triya BelaniChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, USA.
Gurnoor S GillDepartment of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
K V ChalamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, USA.
Shailesh GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Broward Health North, Deerfield Beach, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness globally, emphasizing the urgent need for efficient diagnostic tools. Machine learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has shown promise in automating the diagnosis of retinal conditions with high accuracy. This study evaluates two CNN models, VGG16 and InceptionV3, for classifying retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images into four categories: normal, choroidal neovascularization, diabetic macular edema (DME), and drusen. Methods Using 83,000 OCT images across four categories, the CNNs were trained and tested via Python-based libraries, including TensorFlow and Keras. Metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed with confusion matrices and performance graphs. Comparisons of dataset sizes evaluated the impact on model accuracy with tools deployed on JupyterLab. Results VGG16 and InceptionV3 achieved accuracy between 85% and 95%, with VGG16 peaking at 94% and outperforming InceptionV3 (92%). Larger datasets improved sensitivity by 7% and accuracy across all categories, with the highest performance for normal and drusen classifications. Metrics like sensitivity and specificity positively correlated with dataset size. Conclusions The study confirms CNNs' potential in retinal diagnostics, achieving high classification accuracy. Limitations included reliance on grayscale images and computational intensity, which hindered finer distinctions. Future work should integrate data augmentation, patient-specific variables, and lightweight architectures to optimize performance for clinical use, reducing costs and improving outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecnndiabetic retinopathymachine learningophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID39925554
PMCPMC11802385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.