Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925695›Full record

ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Best practices for the experimental design of one health studies on companion animal and owner microbiomes - From data collection to analysis.

Suzanne B Clougher, Dagmara Niedziela, Piera Versura, Grace Mulcahy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanne B ClougherOphthalmology Unit, DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Italy.
Dagmara NiedzielaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Piera VersuraOphthalmology Unit, DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Italy.
Grace MulcahySchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between owner and companion animal represents an underestimated opportunity for the studying of One Health relationships between humans, animals, and the environment they share. Microbiome exchanges between owner and pet have been documented for the gut, skin, oral, and nasal microbiomes. These studies give a unique insight into bacterial flows between humans and animals, but come with their specific challenges. This review discusses the data and sample collection challenges, as well as laboratory, bioinformatic and data analysis challenges specific to One Health studies on companion animal and owner microbiomes. We provide an overview of possible data to be collected and pitfalls to avoid during sample collection and conservation, DNA extraction, and library preparation. We present the main bioinformatics pipelines in sequencing-data microbiome analysis, as well as data analysis specific to pet-owner microbiome comparison. We review and compare three beta-diversity measures (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, unweighted, and weighted UniFrac distances) for pet-owner distances and the tests to compare them. Finally, we propose a framework with key considerations to bear in mind when designing and carrying out owner-companion animal studies, as well as best practices to implement them. Although these studies come with additional difficulties compared to species-specific microbiome studies, they offer the opportunity to identify biomarkers, environmental triggers, and impacts of pet-owner interactions across species.

Indexed as

Best practicesCompanion animalsGuidelinesMicrobiomeOne healthPet-owner interactionsPets

Identifiers

PMID39925695
PMCPMC11804817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.