Evidence mapPaperPMID 39925976Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Predicting the risk of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction using an interpretable machine learning model.

Qingqing Lin, Wenxiang Zhao, Hailin Zhang, Wenhao Chen, Sheng Lian, Qinyun Ruan, Zhaoyang Qu, Yimin Lin, Dajun Chai, Xiaoyan Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qingqing Lin *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Wenxiang Zhao *National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Hailin ZhangNational Regional Medical Center, Binhai Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Wenhao ChenFujian Key Laboratory of Network Computing and Intelligent Information Processing, College of Computer and Data Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Sheng LianFujian Key Laboratory of Network Computing and Intelligent Information Processing, College of Computer and Data Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Qinyun RuanDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhaoyang QuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yimin LinDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Dajun ChaiNational Regional Medical Center, Binhai Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaoyan LinDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early prediction of heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is essential for personalized treatment. We aimed to use interpretable machine learning (ML) methods to develop a risk prediction model for HF in AMI patients. Methods: We retrospectively included patients initially with AMI who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital from November 2016 to February 2020. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of HF within 3 years after operation. For developing a predictive model for HF risk in AMI patients, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Regression was used to feature selection, and four ML algorithms including Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR) were employed to develop the model on the training set. The performance evaluation of the prediction model was carried out on the training set and the testing set, utilizing metrics including AUC (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA). In addition, we used the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) value to determine the importance of the selected features and interpret the optimal model. Results: A total of 1220 AMI patients were included and 244 (20%) patients developed HF during follow-up. Among the four evaluated ML models, the XGBoost model exhibited exceptional accuracy, with an AUC value of 0.922. The SHAP method showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVDs) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were identified as the three most important characteristics to predict HF risk in AMI patients. Individual risk assessment was performed using SHAP plots and waterfall plot analysis. Conclusions: Our research demonstrates the potential of ML methods in the early prediction of HF risk in AMI patients. Furthermore, it enhances the interpretability of the XGBoost model through SHAP analysis to guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionheart failuremachine learningpredictshapley additive explanations

Identifiers

PMID39925976
PMCPMC11802525

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.