ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Sex differences in intracranial plaque burden in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease: a pilot study based on high-resolution MRI.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atherosclerosis (AS) is the main cause of macrovascular disease. Previous studies have found sex differences in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated macrovascular disease outcomes. However, the relationship between sex differences, T2DM, and AS is not fully understood. This study attempts to explore possible associations between sex, treatment, and the burden of intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) in patients with T2DM who have experienced an acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Methods: We focused on patients with T2DM with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. ICAS was assessed by 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance vascular wall imaging. Plaque counts of the total, proximal, and distal intracranial arteries were used to assess plaque burden. Patients with a history of T2DM and currently taking hypoglycemic drugs were defined as being treated. Poisson regression models or negative binomial regression models were used to analyze the interaction between sex and treatment in relation to plaque burden. Results: A total of 495 plaques were detected in 120 patients (75 male; mean age, 60.77 ± 11.01 years), including 311 proximal and 184 distal plaques. The intracranial culprit plaque was located proximal to the artery in both male (85.3%) and female (88.9%) patients. The adjusted total and proximal intracranial plaque burdens were 1.261 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.050-1.515, P=0.013) and 1.322 times (95%CI, 1.055-1.682, P=0.016) higher in male than in female patients. The risk ratio for proximal plaque burden in untreated male versus female patients was 0.966 (95%CI, 0.704-1.769). However, the proximal plaque risk ratio for treated male versus female patients was 1.530 (95%CI, 1.076-2.174). The interaction of sex and treatment significantly affected the proximal plaque burden. Conclusion: Male patients with T2DM and acute cerebrovascular disease have a significantly higher adjusted risk of total and proximal intracranial plaque burden compared to female patients. Female patients undergoing antidiabetic treatment have a significantly reduced risk of proximal plaque to males. Considering that culprit plaques tend to accumulate in the proximal arteries, understanding how to reduce the burden of proximal plaques may help reduce the risk of adverse cerebrovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.