ReviewCancer medicine2025
A Review of Genomic Testing and SDH- Deficiency in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Getting to the GIST.
Review in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rare Molecular Variants of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): Clinical Implications and Overview of Current Evidence.Targeted oncology · 2026Review
- Targeting the mitochondrial metabolite-dynamics-MDVs-MitoEVs axis: a new frontier in osteoarthritis management.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Performance and clinical utility of two targeted multigene panels for GIST molecular characterization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) have seen significant advancements in their diagnosis and management, driven by targeted therapeutic development and molecular testing. The identification of mutations in genes such as KIT and PDGFRA has transformed treatment approaches, particularly through targeted therapies like imatinib, which have improved patient outcomes. This review explores the critical role of genomic testing in GIST, highlighting its importance in accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, and long-term surveillance for KIT/PDGFRA negative, SDH-deficient GISTs. SDH-deficient GISTs arise from mutations or epigenetic changes affecting the succinate dehydrogenase complex. The complexity of SDH-deficient GISTs, including their association with hereditary syndromes such as Hereditary Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma and/or hypermethylation of the SDHC promoter, underscores the need for comprehensive germline testing. Despite the availability of guidelines, variability exists in genomic testing recommendations across different regions, necessitating a unified approach. This review proposes a simplified algorithm for the genomic workup of GIST, and suggests all individuals with SDH-deficient GIST, regardless of germline testing result, require monitoring for additional SDHx-related tumors, given the lack of widely available methylation and full gene SDHA analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.