Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928076›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025

Complex abdomen: a scoping review.

C Stabilini, S Capoccia Giovannini, G Campanelli, G Cavallaro, U Bracale, G Soliani, F Pecchini, M Frascio, F Carlini, G Longo and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Basal Tone, Muscle Memory and Denervation: Pathophysiological Foundations of Abdominal Wall Hernia Development and Recovery.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The prehabilitation paradox in ventral hernia: from universal to personalized care.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C StabiliniDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
S Capoccia GiovanniniDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy. scapocciagiovannini@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3959-0349
G CampanelliGruppo Ospedaliero San Donato, University of Insubria, Milan, Italy.
G CavallaroDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.
U BracaleDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
G SolianiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Ferrara, Italy.
F PecchiniDivision of General Surgery, Emergency and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, Modena, Italy.
M FrascioDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
F CarliniIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
G LongoIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
A RubartelliIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
G CameriniDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing evidence on the surgical management of complex abdominal wall hernias (CA), focusing on patient-specific factors, hernia characteristics, contamination and operative strategies to their management, in order to identify research gaps and areas for clinical improvement.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, covering publications from January 2015 to June 2024. A total of 6,445 articles were identified, of which 357 met inclusion criteria (303 primary studies and 54 systematic reviews). Studies were classified into three categories: patient-related factors (P), hernia-specific features (H), and contamination (W).

resultsPatient-related factors, particularly obesity and associated comorbidities, were consistently related to higher rates of morbidity and hernia recurrence despite prehabilitation and bariatric surgery were evaluated, results were inconclusive. Hernia-specific features, including large defect size and loss of domain, were associated with increased complication rates. Midline restoration and its achievement with component separation or preoperative botulinum toxin injections, were extensively studied, showing potential benefits. In contaminated settings, synthetic meshes outperformed biologic alternatives, demonstrating lower recurrence and morbidity rates in recent trials. Research in biosynthetic mesh is still needed.

conclusionSurgical management of CA remains a highly demanding clinical scenario with significant variability in outcomes influenced by patient factors and hernia characteristics. Techniques such as component separation and the use of synthetic meshes hold promise, but further high-quality, randomized trials are required to establish standardized protocols and optimize clinical outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Indexed as

Hernia, AbdominalHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyAbdominal WallHumansRecurrenceSurgical MeshBiologic meshComplex abdomenComponent separation – obesityContaminated fieldLoss of domain

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.