Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928107›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of biometeorology2025

Medical mud-pack treatment with different temperatures in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Fulya Demircioğlu Güneri, Fatih Karaarslan, Hülya Özen, Ersin Odabaşi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of biometeorology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fulya Demircioğlu GüneriDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. fuliad@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-0774
Fatih KaraarslanDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-5887
Hülya ÖzenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4144-3732
Ersin OdabaşiDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3986-0146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the effects of medical mud-pack (MMP) treatments applied at different temperatures on the pain and joint functions of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Kellgren Lawrence (KL) stage 3 or 4 KOA patients were included and randomized into three groups. Patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 took MMP treatment to both knees at 39 °C, 42 °C, and 45 °C, respectively. The treatment was performed for 12 days (only weekdays) and was 30 min long per day. The same blinded physician evaluated the patients at baseline and at the end of the treatment. The assessments were done before and after the intervention. The primary outcome was to achieve a minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) for KOA (decrease of at least 19 mm (-40.8%) on the VAS for pain, a decrease of 18.3 mm (-39%) on the patient's global assessment (PGA), and/or a decrease of at least 9.1 points (-26%) on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale (WOMAC-FS). Secondary outcomes were pain (VAS), patient's global assessment (VAS), physician's global assessment (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Patient's health state, Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). 217 patients were analyzed. Groups 1, 2, and 3 had 68, 81,68 patients, respectively. The MCII measurement revealed that MMP treatment did not show a significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (p > 0.05). Also, it was observed that more patients in groups 2 and 3 reached the MCII compared to group 1 (p < 0.001). For the secondary outcomes, significant improvements were observed within-group evaluations for each of the three groups (p < 0.001). Between groups comparisons, the improvements at the end of the treatment were found to be superior for group 2 and group 3 compared to group 1 (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between groups 2 and 3 for any parameters (p > 0.05). The number of patients who achieved the PASS was statistically lower for group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). We observed significant improvements in all groups after treatment. The main result, as measured by MCII, suggests that MMP treatments at 42-45 °C is more effective than at 39 °C in managing severe KOA patients' pain and functional status. We found no significant difference in pain and joint function improvement between 42 °C and 45 °C after MMP.

Indexed as

Mud TherapyOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTemperatureTreatment OutcomeBalneotherapyKnee osteoarthritisMedical mud-pack treatmentPeloidotherapyThermal therapy

Identifiers

PMID39928107
PMCPMC12479676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.