Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928581›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2025

Plant PI-PLC signaling in stress and development.

Ana M Laxalt, Max van Hooren, Teun Munnik

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana M LaxaltInstituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, IIB-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-2441
Max van HoorenPlant Cell Biologie, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9339-8390
Teun MunnikPlant Cell Biologie, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4919-4913

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaEuropean Union EPPN2020Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) signaling is involved in various plant stress and developmental responses. Though several aspects of this lipid signaling pathway are conserved within animals and plants, clear differences have also emerged. While animal PLC signaling is characterized by the hydrolysis of PIP2 and production of IP3 and DAG as second messengers to activate Ca2+ and PKC signaling, plant PI-PLCs seem to predominantly use PIP as substrate and convert IP2 and DAG into inositolpolyphosphates and phosphatidic acid (PA) as plant second messengers. Sequencing of multiple plant genomes confirmed that plant PLC signaling evolved differently from animals, lacking homologs of the IP3 gated-Ca2+ channel, PKC and TRP channels, and with PLC enzymes resembling the PLCζ subfamily, which lacks the conserved PH domain that binds PIP2. With emerging tools in plant molecular biology, data analyses, and advanced imaging, plant PLC signaling is ready to gain momentum.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide Phospholipase CPlant DevelopmentPlantsSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalPlant ProteinsPhosphoinositide Phospholipase CPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39928581
PMCPMC11809592

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.