ArticlePloS one2025
User experience with pregnancy tracker mobile apps: Findings from comment-based qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awareness, Preferences, and Willingness to Download Pregnancy Health Management Apps Among Women in Louisiana: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The effect of mobile applications used during pregnancy on prenatal distress and attachment.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, millions of pregnant women use pregnancy-related apps to monitor their baby's growth and development. While most of the apps are user-friendly, not all of them are equally appealing. This study aimed to explore the user experience (UX) of pregnancy tracker mobile apps used by pregnant women.
methodsThis study explored the dynamics between users' experiences and multifaceted dimensions of advanced features, high-quality materials and information, strict privacy policies, problem-solving abilities, and the usefulness of app features and contents. This study applied reviewers' comment-based qualitative study, accessing crowdsourced data gathered from different pregnancy tracker app websites. A thematic and content analysis approach was used.
resultsThis study found that when users are satisfied with using advanced content and features, it aligns with their perceived self-righteousness and rationality, and reflects their cultural values and expectations of using the apps. Conversely, when users encounter challenges such as erroneous baby size comparison and app updating issues, they perceive these as disadvantages of the apps utilised. Moreover, the study sheds light on the specific desires of pregnant women, highlighting their expectations for content that addresses their physical and mental well-being, as well as their unborn babies. The desire for free access reflects the cultural emphasis on cost-effectiveness, while the willingness to invest financially in enhanced experiences demonstrates the recognition of the value and potential benefits of improved content and features. This study also provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between users' experiences, cultural values, advanced features, high-quality materials and information, privacy policies, problem-solving abilities, and relevant content in creating positive app experiences that align with users' cultural expectations and needs.
conclusionThis study provides essential insights into the user experience and underscores the importance of a user-centric design approach for developers. By capturing the current landscape of these digital tools, can provide valuable feedback for the enhancement of existing applications and guide the development of future iterations, ensuring the diverse preferences and expectations of pregnant women worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.