Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

In vitro antibiofilm efficacy of ertapenem, tobramycin, and moxifloxacin against biofilms grown in a glass bead or CDC Biofilm Reactor®.

Annika L Gilmore, Helena Vu, Travis Martinez, Lousili Peniata, Brooke Kawaguchi, David A Armbruster, Nicholas N Ashton, Dustin L Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annika L GilmoreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7768-8972
Helena VuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Travis MartinezDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9885-4669
Lousili PeniataDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Brooke KawaguchiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
David A ArmbrusterDepuy Synthes, West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Nicholas N AshtonDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Dustin L WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory grown biofilms are used to simulate bacterial growth in diverse environmental conditions and screen the effectiveness of anti-biofilm therapies. Recently, we developed a glass bead biofilm reactor that utilizes low broth volume to provide high-throughput biofilm growth for testing and translation across the research continuum (e.g., benchtop assays to preclinical models). Bioburden per mm2 surface area of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were comparable on beads and CDC Biofilm Reactor® coupons. In this study, we hypothesized that biofilms grown on beads would be more susceptible to ertapenem, moxifloxacin, and tobramycin than those grown on coupons. Results indicated a significant reduction in S. aureus bioburden on glass beads compared to glass coupons following treatment with ertapenem (p = 0.005) and tobramycin (p = 0.014). P. aeruginosa biofilms had smaller differences in antibiotic response between the two systems. There was a significantly greater reduction in bead P. aeruginosa biofilm than coupon when treated with tobramycin (p = 0.035). This work offered insight into how the bead biofilm reactor could be used as a tool for antibiotic screening and translation across the continuum of in vitro to in vivo systems that support development of antimicrobial technology.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsBioreactorsFluoroquinolonesTobramycinErtapenemGlassMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsErtapenemFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinTobramycin

Identifiers

PMID39928650
PMCPMC11809895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.