ArticlePloS one2025
In vitro antibiofilm efficacy of ertapenem, tobramycin, and moxifloxacin against biofilms grown in a glass bead or CDC Biofilm Reactor®.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil-Dwelling Bacteria Display Tolerance Against Typical Antibiotic Serum Levels in an Ex Vivo Model of Traumatized Tissue.Military medicine · 2026Article
- A Review on the Current and Future State of Urinary Tract Infection Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory grown biofilms are used to simulate bacterial growth in diverse environmental conditions and screen the effectiveness of anti-biofilm therapies. Recently, we developed a glass bead biofilm reactor that utilizes low broth volume to provide high-throughput biofilm growth for testing and translation across the research continuum (e.g., benchtop assays to preclinical models). Bioburden per mm2 surface area of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were comparable on beads and CDC Biofilm Reactor® coupons. In this study, we hypothesized that biofilms grown on beads would be more susceptible to ertapenem, moxifloxacin, and tobramycin than those grown on coupons. Results indicated a significant reduction in S. aureus bioburden on glass beads compared to glass coupons following treatment with ertapenem (p = 0.005) and tobramycin (p = 0.014). P. aeruginosa biofilms had smaller differences in antibiotic response between the two systems. There was a significantly greater reduction in bead P. aeruginosa biofilm than coupon when treated with tobramycin (p = 0.035). This work offered insight into how the bead biofilm reactor could be used as a tool for antibiotic screening and translation across the continuum of in vitro to in vivo systems that support development of antimicrobial technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.