Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928778›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2025

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine combined with Western medicine for Helicobacter pylori-related gastric ulcer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Meiqi Zhong, Qifang Sun, Baoping Ren, Chang Yu, Shunhua Zhou, Qing Gao, Xiaojuan Wang, Chengzhi Yuan, Jing Lu, Qinghua Peng and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Meiqi ZhongHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2137-7651
Qifang SunHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Baoping RenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chang YuHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shunhua ZhouHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Qing GaoHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiaojuan WangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chengzhi YuanHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jing LuSchool of Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Qinghua PengSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Meiyan ZengSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Houpan SongHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-1026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the effectiveness and safety of different Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) combined with Western medicines (WMs) regimen versus WMs alone in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related gastric ulcer (GU).

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted on databases from their inception to May 31, 2023, to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of CPMs in combination with conventional WMs in the treatment of patients with H pylori-related GU. Using Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, we evaluated the methodological quality of RCTs. R version 4.2.3 and Stata version 15.1 software were cross-merged to conduct pairwise NMA.

resultsA total of 35 studies involving 4667 patients and 11 CPMs were identified. Eleven CPMs were analyzed, including Pingwei Capsule (PWC), Kangfuxin Solution (KFXS), Shugan Jieyu Capsule (SGJYC), Weisu Granule (WSG), Qiwei Weitong Capsule (QWWTC), Beiling Weitong Granule (BLWTG), Anweiyang Capsule (AWYC), Jinghua Weikang Capsule (JHWKC), Weifuchun Tablet (WFCT), Wenweishu Capsule (WWSC), and Weidean Capsule (WDAC). Results showed that the combination of CPM and WM was more effective relative to the WM regimen alone. NMA revealed that WWSC combined with the WM yielded superior results in enhancing clinical outcomes and mitigating GU recurrence rates. PWC combined with the WM showed the best performance in improving the H pylori eradication rate. WFCT combined with the WM had the most optimal performance in controlling gastrin (GAS) and motilin (MTL) levels. KFXS combined with the WM showed the best results in terms of reducing the incidence of adverse events.

conclusionOur NMA findings indicate that the combination of WWSC, PWC, WFCT, and KFXS with WM may be more effective and advantageous outcomes compared to other CPMs. Due to the limitations of this study, future research should employ larger sample sizes and multicenter RCTs to conduct real-world clinical studies.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriStomach UlcerAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrugs, Chinese Herbal

Identifiers

PMID39928778
PMCPMC11813025

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.