Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928829›Full record

ReviewMedicine2025

Reducing the workload of medical diagnosis through artificial intelligence: A narrative review.

Jinseo Jeong, Sohyun Kim, Lian Pan, Daye Hwang, Dongseop Kim, Jeongwon Choi, Yeongkyo Kwon, Pyeongro Yi, Jisoo Jeong, Seok-Ju Yoo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07558746 (AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07558746 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine: A Triple-Arm, Triple-Blind, Parallel-Design Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAl-Quds UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled159ConditionsRadiology, Internship and Residency, AI (Artificial Intelligence)ArmsAI prompt (Correct), AI prompt (Incorrect)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial intelligence for early diagnosis in emergency department.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  10. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jinseo JeongCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Sohyun KimCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Lian PanCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Daye HwangCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Dongseop KimCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Jeongwon ChoiCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Yeongkyo KwonCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Pyeongro YiCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Jisoo JeongCollege of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Seok-Ju YooDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9764-8097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized medical diagnostics by enhancing efficiency, improving accuracy, and reducing variability. By alleviating the workload of medical staff, AI addresses challenges such as increasing diagnostic demands, workforce shortages, and reliance on subjective interpretation. This review examines the role of AI in reducing diagnostic workload and enhancing efficiency across medical fields from January 2019 to February 2024, identifying limitations and areas for improvement. A comprehensive PubMed search using the keywords "artificial intelligence" or "AI," "efficiency" or "workload," and "patient" or "clinical" identified 2587 articles, of which 51 were reviewed. These studies analyzed the impact of AI on radiology, pathology, and other specialties, focusing on efficiency, accuracy, and workload reduction. The final 51 articles were categorized into 4 groups based on diagnostic efficiency, where category A included studies with supporting material provided, category B consisted of those with reduced data volume, category C focused on independent AI diagnosis, and category D included studies that reported data reduction without changes in diagnostic time. In radiology and pathology, which require skilled techniques and large-scale data processing, AI improved accuracy and reduced diagnostic time by approximately 90% or more. Radiology, in particular, showed a high proportion of category C studies, as digitized data and standardized protocols facilitated independent AI diagnoses. AI has significant potential to optimize workload management, improve diagnostic efficiency, and enhance accuracy. However, challenges remain in standardizing applications and addressing ethical concerns. Integrating AI into healthcare workforce planning is essential for fostering collaboration between technology and clinicians, ultimately improving patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceWorkloadHumans

Identifiers

PMID39928829
PMCPMC11813001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.