ReviewMedicine2025
Reducing the workload of medical diagnosis through artificial intelligence: A narrative review.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07558746 (AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine: A Triple-Arm, Triple-Blind, Parallel-Design Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare-A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Interpretation of Electroretinography (ERG) Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- How Does Medical Artificial Intelligence Revolutionize Physician Productivity?Yonsei medical journal · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning for the Interpretation of Serum Protein and Immunofixation Electrophoresis in Multiple Myeloma: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Barriers, Facilitators, and Intention to Use AI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Mixed Methods Study Among Austrian Physicians With and Without AI Experience.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Metabolomics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) assisted metabolomics in the diagnosis of non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections: progress and challenges.New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Performance of Advanced Large Language Models in Laboratory Medicine Using Residency Examinations.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for early diagnosis in emergency department.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Review
- Trends in the China pathologist workforce From 2010 to 2022.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- An integrative neurogenomics workflow for precision medicine in neurodegenerative disorders.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Real-World Nutrition Assessment: Structured Prompts, Multi-Model Validation and Expert Oversight.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Integrating tumor location into artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Interpretable machine learning models for beta thalassemia prediction: an explainable AI approach for smart healthcare 5.0.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Cytopathology 2.0: How Artificial Intelligence Is Redefining the Future of Cytopathology.Journal of cytologyReview
- Artificial intelligence in modern clinical practice (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized medical diagnostics by enhancing efficiency, improving accuracy, and reducing variability. By alleviating the workload of medical staff, AI addresses challenges such as increasing diagnostic demands, workforce shortages, and reliance on subjective interpretation. This review examines the role of AI in reducing diagnostic workload and enhancing efficiency across medical fields from January 2019 to February 2024, identifying limitations and areas for improvement. A comprehensive PubMed search using the keywords "artificial intelligence" or "AI," "efficiency" or "workload," and "patient" or "clinical" identified 2587 articles, of which 51 were reviewed. These studies analyzed the impact of AI on radiology, pathology, and other specialties, focusing on efficiency, accuracy, and workload reduction. The final 51 articles were categorized into 4 groups based on diagnostic efficiency, where category A included studies with supporting material provided, category B consisted of those with reduced data volume, category C focused on independent AI diagnosis, and category D included studies that reported data reduction without changes in diagnostic time. In radiology and pathology, which require skilled techniques and large-scale data processing, AI improved accuracy and reduced diagnostic time by approximately 90% or more. Radiology, in particular, showed a high proportion of category C studies, as digitized data and standardized protocols facilitated independent AI diagnoses. AI has significant potential to optimize workload management, improve diagnostic efficiency, and enhance accuracy. However, challenges remain in standardizing applications and addressing ethical concerns. Integrating AI into healthcare workforce planning is essential for fostering collaboration between technology and clinicians, ultimately improving patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.