Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929503›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Clinicians' experience with infographic summaries from the BMJ Rapid Recommendations: a qualitative user-testing study among residents and interns at a large teaching hospital in Switzerland.

Tiffany Hirschel, Per Vandvik, Thomas Agoritsas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tiffany HirschelAnesthesiology Division, Department of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2323-1330
Per VandvikMAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas AgoritsasMAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, Oslo, Norway Thomas.Agoritsas@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6182-9969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinicians need trustworthy clinical practice guidelines to succeed with evidence-based diagnosis and treatment at the bedside. The BMJ Rapid Recommendations explore innovative ways to enhance dissemination and uptake, including multilayered interactive infographics linked to a digitally structured authoring and publication platform (the MAGICapp). We aimed to assess user experiences of physicians in training in various specialties when they interact with these infographics.

designWe conducted a qualitative user-testing study to assess user experience of a convenience sample of physicians in training. User testing was carried out through guided think-aloud sessions. We assessed six facets of user experience using a revised version of Morville's framework: usefulness, understandability, usability, credibility, desirability and identification.

settingSetting include Geneva's University Hospital, a large teaching hospital in Switzerland.

participantsParticipants include a convenience sample of residents and interns without restriction regarding medical field or division of care.

resultsMost users reported a positive experience. The infographics were understandable and useful to rapidly grasp the key elements of the recommendation, its rationale and supporting evidence, in a credible way. Some users felt intimidated by numbers or the amount of information, although they perceived there could be a learning curve while using generic formats. Plain language summaries helped complement the visuals but could be further highlighted. Despite their generally positive experience, several users had limited understanding of key GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) domains of the quality of evidence and remained uncertain by the implication of weak or conditional recommendations.

conclusionOur study allowed to identify several aspects of guideline formats that improve their understandability and usefulness. Guideline organisations can use our findings to adapt their presentation format to enhance their dissemination and uptake in clinical practice. Avenues for research include the interplay between infographics and the digital authoring platform, multiple comparisons and living guidelines.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInformation DisseminationInternship and ResidencyPractice Guidelines as TopicAdultFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSwitzerlandInformation technologyMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID39929503
PMCPMC11815444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.