Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929599›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025

Young people and parent or carers views on type 2 diabetes mellitus care in England and Wales: analysis of parent and patient-reported measures survey.

Katherine Hawton, Hannah Hickingbotham, Pooja Sachdev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine HawtonBristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK katherine.hawton@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-0935
Hannah HickingbothamSt George's Hospital, London, UK.
Pooja SachdevNottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in children and young people (CYP) is increasing in the UK and worldwide. Little is known about the experience young people and their families have when attending for their diabetes care. The aim of this study is to analyse the responses to the Parent and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREM) survey 2021-2022 for patients with T2DM and their families to inform care.

methodsAs part of the National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA) (2022), the NPDA PREM survey was open online between August 2021 and January 2022. The data have previously been analysed collectively for all diabetes; however, we specifically analysed the data for patients living with T2DM.

results9.2% (105/1144) of young people living with T2DM in England and Wales responded to the NPDA PREM survey, mostly aged 12-16 years (61.9%) and the majority were female (67.6%). 87% of patients and 95% of carers said that they would recommend their diabetes team, and 73% of patients felt happy after appointments. Only just over half of the patients and parents felt well prepared for transferring to adult care. Only 38% of patients felt that their school or college often had the necessary information to support them with their diabetes.

conclusionsThis analysis describes the experience of CYP and their parents/carers of T2DM care and highlights areas for improvement. These findings may help to inform recommendations about the development of better patient-centred care for young people with T2DM.

Indexed as

CaregiversDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ParentsAdolescentChildEnglandFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesWalesAdolescent HealthDiabetesEndocrinology

Identifiers

PMID39929599
PMCPMC11815463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.