ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning prediction of glaucoma by heavy metal exposure: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 to 2008.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Machine Learning in the Research of Heavy Metal(loid)s-Related Risk: A Scoping Review of Methodology.Toxics · 2026Review
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Metallomic Analysis of Vitreous Humor of the Human Eye-A Post-Mortem Multielemental Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Diabetes Burden and Healthcare Barriers Among Cataract Patients in Imo State, Nigeria.Annals of global health · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Glaucoma Risk and Vision-Related Quality of Life in Rural Nigeria.Annals of global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using follow-up data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, we have collected information on 2572 subjects and used generalized linear model to investigate the association between urinary heavy metal levels and glaucoma risk. In addition, we have developed an individualized risk prediction model using machine learning algorithms and further interpreted the model results through feature importance analysis, local cumulative analysis, and interaction effects. In this study, we found significant association between logarithmically calculated arsenic (As) metabolites, especially arsenochlorine (AC), and glaucoma after adjusting for a series of confounders, including urinary creatinine (β = 1.090, 95% CI: 0.313-1.835). The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis results and clinical risk scores also indicated that As metabolites promoted glaucoma more severely than other variables. This study applied machine learning for the first time to explore the relationship between heavy metals and glaucoma while analyzing the effects of multiple heavy metal exposures on the disease, improving the predictive power compared to conventional models. Our results provided important insights into the potential role of heavy metals in the pathogenesis of glaucoma, facilitated the discovery of new biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk assessment, and timely treatment of glaucoma, and guided public health measures to reduce heavy metal exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.