ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears among Football Players.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common causes of lost playing time in American football athletes. Recently, there has been a push to get athletes back to sport faster. As such, numerous studies have evaluated management and rehabilitation protocols for return to play after ACL injury in football players. The purpose of this review is to synthesize information, both classic and new, to aid orthopedic surgeons in treatment of football players with ACL injuries. RECENT
findingsRecent studies have demonstrated that not all ACL injuries are alike. Management should be a shared decision-making process between athlete and surgeon. Studies have demonstrated low failure rates when using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTPB) autograft which is the most common graft utilized for elite football athletes. Outcomes are continually being evaluated by multicenter study groups such as the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcome Network which has established a thorough rehabilitation protocol focusing on athlete milestones. ACL tears in the football athlete are common and challenging injuries. Treatment revolves around ACL reconstruction, most commonly with BTPB autograft. Post-operative rehabilitation is essential and should focus on objective criteria rather than time elapsed. Return to play criteria rely upon symptoms, athlete confidence, strength, and both functional and football specific testing. Return-to-play timelines are individualized for each football athlete but recent trends have highlighted a more delayed return of at least 7-9 months. Rate of returning to play varies from 63-82% and depends upon many factors including level of play and position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.