ArticleBMC public health2025
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of coronary heart disease patients towards antithrombotic therapy.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of antithrombotic therapy in prognosticating patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is crucial. This study evaluated the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of CHD patients regarding antithrombotic therapy.
methodsThis cross-sectional study distributed questionnaires to collect data. Participants' demographic information was recorded, and their KAP scores were assessed. The Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) measured self-efficacy.
resultsThe study comprised 639 individuals. The median scores were as follows: knowledge score 8 (IQR 6-10), attitude score 25 (IQR 23-27), and practice score 22 (IQR 20-24). Notably, up to 70% of patients incorrectly responded to questions about dosage and administration of antithrombotic agents, and approximately 40% lacked awareness of the treatment's importance and side effects. Low practice scores were independently linked to rural residence, low attitude scores, and poor self-efficacy. Furthermore, Predictive factors for low self-efficacy included being underweight, having a high family income, a short medical history, and low attitude scores.
conclusionsThe surveyed patients with CHD exhibited good attitudes, practices, and self-efficacy but demonstrated only median knowledge levels toward antithrombotic therapy, especially about the importance and precautions associated with antithrombotic treatment. Therefore, initiatives aimed at improving adherence to antithrombotic therapy among CHD patients should focus on the knowledge gaps, especially for patients in rural areas. Improving the patient KAP could help improve the physician-patient interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.