ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Biophysical aspects of mechanotransduction in cells and their physiological/biological implications in vocal fold vibration: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Human Vocal Fold Organ-On-Chip for Studying Platform-Dependent Mucosal Responses to Particulate Matter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Piezo channels in tumors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- MRA and Doppler ultrasound of laryngeal blood flow under hormonal and hydration modulation.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Cross-kingdom RNA interference in the dysbiosis-mediated network of vocal fold fibrosis: a pathogenic hypothesis and molecular intervention targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- A hybrid vocal fold phonatory platform for pediatric phonation modeling.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanotransduction is a crucial property in all organisms, modulating cellular behaviors in response to external mechanical stimuli. Given the high mobility of vocal folds, it is hypothesized that mechanotransduction significantly contributes to their tissue homeostasis. Recent studies have identified mechanosensitive proteins in vocal fold epithelia, supporting this hypothesis. Voice therapy, which, involves the mobilization of vocal folds, aims to rehabilitate vocal function and restore homeostasis. However, establishing a direct causal link between specific mechanical stimuli and therapeutic benefits is challenging due to the variability in voice therapy techniques. This challenge is further compounded when investigating biological benefits in humans. Vocal fold tissue cannot be biopsied without significant impairment of the vibratory characteristics of the vocal folds. Conversely, studies using vocal fold mimetic bioreactors have demonstrated that mechanical stimulation of vocal fold fibroblasts can lead to highly heterogeneous responses, depending on the nature and parameters of the induced vibration. These responses can either aid or impede vocal fold vibration at the physiological level. Future research is needed to determine the specific mechanical parameters that are biologically beneficial for vocal fold function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.